Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Existing lines (Score 1) 249

That's why I'm "conservative" in my answer and simply say, "NO RESEARCH ON HUMANS WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT, PERIOD!"

I'm actually with you on this. But you forget one thing: we have all agreed that children cannot give consent, and their parents or guardians get to do that for them. So all of the embryonic stem cell lines are created with the consent of the donors, who are the figures with legal authority to give consent in this case.

All pediatric research uses consent from the parents. Stem cells are exactly the same. Kids aren't able to decide, which is why we don't allow them to vote or buy cigarettes.

When those embryos are allowed to vote, buy cigarettes, get married... then you ought to ask them. Until then, we just ask their "parents".

Comment Re:About an Autobahn lane projector ? (Score 1) 856

While that is a closer example, your feet should touch the ground on a motorcycle. You can balance with your feet on the ground without taking your butt off the seat.

I concur though, that if bikes want to ask cars to follow all the laws then they ought to to. Which is why if I ever roll through a stop when there is another car around, I give anyone permission to squish me.

I don't think *I'M* really claiming moral high ground. I just don't appreciate being honked at when I'm doing what I'm supposed to be doing. I'll make you a deal: motor vehicles can use their better judgment for speed limits (and here in RI, the limits are way off... 25 pretty much everywhere except a highway... that's ludicrous) and bikes can use their better judgment for residential all way stops. Everything else, and you're getting run off the road.

Comment Re:About an Autobahn lane projector ? (Score 1) 856

I think it has more to do with the fact that I have to dismount my bike to come to a full stop. Unless you have a special bike, your feet don't touch the ground and you'll fall over. That doesn't hold for a car. You don't have to agree with me. I'm just explaining why I (and SOME of the laws agree, but mostly not right now) will sometimes roll through a stop. And I'm certainly not influencing your driving experience in the slightest to do so.

I also hate those superfluous stop signs. In fact, I hate them more on my bike than in my car.

Comment Re:About an Autobahn lane projector ? (Score 1) 856

Yield and run are not the same thing. Yield means slow down, and if no one else is coming you can go. If other people are coming you DO NOT have the right of way, and should be run over. It doesn't give you right of way, it just means that a rolling stop when no other vehicles are coming is acceptable for a bike. And this isn't true in most places. I'm breaking the law to do it, and if you've seen me do it from a car, then I'm doing it wrong and you ought to run over me by my own admission.

Cyclists ARE routinely not following the rules. Run them over. But so are drivers. Tractor trailer drivers, I'm relying on you to help evolution along. I appreciate that some people suck at doing things, but you can't make all roads "CAR ONLY" because some people suck at using roads.

I'm fully in favor of ticketing cyclists, making them have insurance, get a registration, take a class to learn how to ride a bike without being a douche, what ever. But roads are simply not for motor vehicles only. That's what freeways are for, and bikers on one have disobeyed the law and should get squished.

Really, if we attempt to squish only the BAD drivers or cyclists, we will eventually breed those traits out.

Comment Re:About an Autobahn lane projector ? (Score 1) 856

This is actually the ONE traffic law that doesn't work out well for bikes. I both bike and drive a lot, and in certain situations when biking, I admit that I will treat a stop sign as a yield instead. In my residential neighborhood, there are some stops that I can see for blocks in any direction, and it's a four way stop. Any car visible at all will reach the stop before me. If there are no visible cars at all, then I slow down as much as possible, then speed back up. It is actually safer for me to keep moving a little bit than to stop completely. This is being reflected by some communities passing laws allowing cyclists to do just this: pretend a stop sign says yield.

Now, all of this goes out the window when there are other cars, it's not a four way stop in a residential area, it's dark, it's raining... In ALL of those situations, you need to stop. Along with every other traffic sign. You need to follow those.

As someone who uses roads, I generally reserve my vitriol for people who are not following the rules. I secretly hope that bikers who run red lights (or ride on the sidewalk, ride against traffic, insert illegal activity here...) get hit by cars. I also hope that drivers who pass unsafely (or run red lights, don't signal turns, stop to let someone else go when they have a clear right of way, insert bad driver activity here...) get run off the road by tractor trailers.

In my opinion, many people fall into the "bad" category in both parties, and deserve to be in serious accidents. But just because some people can't do it correctly doesn't mean no one should be allowed.

Comment Re:Why not... (Score 1) 122

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15477546?ordinalpos=13&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

Short version: Pot didn't help keep the patients on the most effective meds. (which is an issue for Parkinson's... you can't just take the meds forever. They stop working)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15111259?ordinalpos=18&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

Short version: pot might help people with Parkinson's, and here's how. Need to test that out.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15372606?ordinalpos=15&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

Short version: if you ask patients, 25% of them admit to using pot, and about half of those people said it helps.

I couldn't find any trials on cannabis alone as a treatment or how it compares to Levadopa in my cursory 2 minutes search.

Comment Re:...lol (Score 2, Insightful) 122

I can't speak definitively on the physiology here, but I don't think it's really quite that subjective. People respond to intense aerobic exercise with dopamine release, the same way that people release insulin in response to glucose. Some people might have flaws in that system, but overall, this is "how it works". I believe the system is designed to make you able to keep going even when running started being unpleasant, since if you are running, it's most likely (in the long term scheme at least) because something is chasing you, or you're chasing something, and either way, you'd want to keep going even after the oxygen levels in your muscles drop enough to cause lactic acid build up and the accompanying pain. A little bit of brain chemicals will help you ignore it and catch food/avoid being food.

The dopamine release may contribute to "loving the burn" or the "runner's high" but they aren't the sole cause. I love video games, and I also happen to like running. The runner's high I get doesn't work on a treadmill, though. I hate treadmills. Staring at a wall while running ruins the entire experience for me. But if I forced myself to do it, I still get dopamine released afterward. I just didn't enjoy it, because I was too busy thinking "wow this sucks a lot".

I think you just don't like running. Which is fair. I doubt you don't release dopamine after aerobic exercise. You just don't notice it that much because you're thinking "wow this sucks a lot".

Comment Re:...lol (Score 4, Insightful) 122

Well in this study, they mention that they see significant improvements in depression symptoms and dopamine levels, which you don't see with normal exercise, and the researchers hypothesize that something about the video game component is causing this. There are actually quite a few studies finding that using the Wii is an incredibly effective form of rehab. One case report: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18689607?ordinalpos=13&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

And all of the studies refer to it as a "low-cost gaming console". In comparison to traditional rehab, which cost just as much in equipment then add in the billing rate of a physical or occupational therapist, the Wii is dirt cheap.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Engineering without management is art." -- Jeff Johnson

Working...