Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Wrong. (Score 1) 419

That’s author’s right.

Copyright is the right to copy. To publish. Given by the author to the publisher. And a relatively recent invention.

Of course they both exist, based on the assumption that an idea is also a physical product. Which obviously is bullshit, and therefore the whole reverse pyramids built on top are bullshit too.

I’m planning on using the following method for future projects:
- Instead of pitching my idea to a publisher, I pitch it to the general public.
- It will include a clear list of requirements, just like with a publisher.
- Now people can, over a system similar to PayPal, pre-order/finance that game. BUT they don’t actually pay anything. We just make a simple contract (no stupid giant list of terms!!) that if I fulfill the requirements, they will pay that amount.
- They can themselves decide, how much they want to pay/invest.
- With that contractual commitment, I can e.g. go to a bank, and lend me the required money. (Which always [including interest] has to be smaller than the actual committed money, for me to make a profit too.)
- The project will go in cycles, like the spiral model. In a prototype-based, test-driven way.
- When all the requirements are fulfilled, I create a new pitch, with perhaps a trailer, and everything.
- Then I listen to the new input of the people, and create a new list of requirements.
- People can then, based on my bigger commitment, also make bigger commitments. (E.g. raise it from $5 to $10.)
- If I can not continue to work on the project, with the money that that gives me, I have to A) make a better pitch, B) commit to bigger goals, C) market it to more people.
- I will always be completely honest and open to my customers. I try to be someone that gets payed because people think I deserve it. Not because of some nasty trickery/fraud/EA.
And now the kicker:
- If the game comes out, those who committed to paying, will actually own the game! Just like a publisher. They are the only ones who are getting a copy.
- They are free to do with it, whatever they like. Full stop. If someone else wants it too, they can themselves decide, if they want to make it a business, and sell it. Or if they want to give it away to good friends. (Who then of course can sell it themselves, if they find someone who buys it.)

I think that model is more fitting to what software actually is: Information, that resulted from a service.
You see, how far away from concepts like “copyright” that is, and how little those concepts are actually needed.

I await you comments on how this whole idea is horrible, idiotic and will never ever work. ;))
(Then I’ll learn from you, if you made constructive critique, and laugh at you, if you didn’t ;)

Comment Re:The Size of the Frontal Region is One Factor (Score 1) 568

I generally agree. But what is that “above that of an animal”. Are you seriously still thinking, that humans aren’t animals?

That doesn’t fit in with the rest of what you’re saying, but rather with the talk of someone who reads the bible a lot, refers to developing nations as “savages” and thinks the sun revolves around the earth, but especially around him. ^^

So I’m assuming a typo. :)

Comment Re:Great actor (Score 0, Troll) 324

Who enjoys Christmas Carols? The only Christmas Carol I could enjoy would be a hooker with an extra-dirty fantasy. ^^

Oh, and now a quote from the best Christmas movie ever:

“Fuck me Santa! Fuck me Santa! Fuck me Santa! Fuck me Santa!” XD

Comment Re:One killer "gadget" (Score 1) 313

Should we send a thank you note to the cheap Chinese (and other) workers in those Gulag-like factories?

P.S.: It’s so stupid. If the products were so expensive, that people there could live at a high standard, then they could buy so much stuff that by selling them that stuff, we could afford those expensive products anyway.
There was an interesting study, that showed that an economy can be in two stable states. The high standard and the low standard (of living) one. And the important part was, that for both states, the economy and businesses ran just as well. There was no difference from their p.o.v.
But prepare yourself, because according to the study, we are headed for the lower stable state, and it’s very hard to get out of there once you’re in it. (Well, technically we are definitely already in it. But it can still get even worse.)
I don’t get why business people don’t get this simple rule: The more you pay your employees, the more they will be able to buy! I guess it’s short-term greed. It takes time for it to come back. Even if it is more profitable in the long run, short term greed seems to win...

Slashdot Top Deals

Physician: One upon whom we set our hopes when ill and our dogs when well. -- Ambrose Bierce

Working...