Comment Re:Small problem (Score 1) 378
Disagreeing with someone is not trolling.
I agree! It's a good thing that your statement has 50% less disagreement.
Disagreeing with someone is not trolling.
I agree! It's a good thing that your statement has 50% less disagreement.
Not sure why this comment is modded "troll". It's 100% accurate.
Beacause it had at least 50% more trolling.
because they were all slaughtered by homos
Whoa, easy there. That could be misconstrued.... and if you were referring to the homo genus, homo sapiens neanderthalensis was a member.
FTFA: He could now effectively be held responsible for around $6,000 in assistance already provided by the state along with future child support payments.
The question you should be asking is "Why should everyone else have to pay for it?"
Everyone pays for everyone else's children. Since he has been found by the court to be financially responsible for the child, is he going to be given the normal tax breaks associated with dependents?
Yes. Next question?
I realize you're jesting, but that's only because you haven't seen the list of blockable things:
ie. It's not just "porn".
TorrentFreak *is* covered by that list and was therefore blocked.
I just looked at that list, and cannot see a relevant category.
I'd be ok with it too if it meant that Granny paid very little, but I think that we'll see Granny paying the same amount she currently is while everyone else gets to pay out the ass without being able to turn to alternate ISPs. It's not like this is really going to lower anyone's monthly fees, even Granny's; it's just an excuse to charge more. I would love to be proven wrong, but that's just not the business model these creeps run.
Even more than the inevitable cash grab, I'd be worried that this kind of payment scheme would lead to a lack of investment in upgraded infrastructure. If people get charged per bit, they will use less. Less demand leads to less upgrading of lines, and the people who do actually need massive data throughput, for stuff like, for example, off-site redundant systems, can't actually get what they need at all. People will always get charged for what they want compared to what the average is, no matter how much it would cost to upgrade everyone to that level. As an example of that: about 5 years ago a customer was paying â1k a month for a fast (for here) no contention line. Now you can get the same speed with 5:1 contention for about â30 a month.
Stage management. Drama. Theatrics.
In the end? The powerful will be more so - you will pay more, and get less.
Mission accomplished, and your expectations diminished, as planned.
Related to the above and regarding the title of the article, why would big Silicon Valley heads care if Washington DID implode? They are all sitting on massive warchests of "foreign" money sitting in US dollar accounts in American banks beloning to their foreign subsidiaries for tax avoidance purposes. This money will NEVER be brought home (in terms of paying tax: it is actually back in America), it just sits there piling up, acting as a bank account, and when someone cashes in his shares he pays longterm capital gains on the value of his shares, which includes a bit of that massive pile of cash. Now, if the debt ceiling is breached.... US treasury bond interest rates will go up, and bank interest rates will rise as a result. Good result if you have several tens of billions of dollars to put into a long term deposit account.
It will be a good thing, when America slides down the hole that swallowed Rome, Assyria, Babylon and Egypt.
Which one? Taxation to support an oversized army, not having a big enough army, climate change, or having the Greeks in charge?
Linear Script A is still not decoded - though apparently related to Linear Script B (which has been decoded) it is still not translatable.
There are others - http://www.omniglot.com/writing/undeciphered.htm
The problem is not exactly solvable. All translated texts in existence have something related to base the translation on. The Egyptian Hieroglyphs were untranslatable, until the Rosetta stone provided a sequence of texts. Two were already known, which matched in their translations - thus implying that the unknown third was the same text in that language (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosetta_Stone).
This article from a few weeks back could provide a possible entry point for beginning to decipher texts like that. Since it relies not on dictionaries, but rather the relationships between words, it may be possible to narrow down the meanings of words in unknown languages into smaller groups of possible translations, or at least I imagine so from reading it.
Trying to be happy is like trying to build a machine for which the only specification is that it should run noiselessly.