Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Legally, how? (Score 1) 645

No. When I buy something on my Kindle, I am buying a "non-exclusive right to keep a permanent copy of the applicable Digital Content and to view, use, and display such Digital Content an unlimited number of times". That is what they gave me. The device is my property, and while the copy does not belong to me under certain definitions of ownership, I have a licence to use it in perpetuity. As far as I can tell from a cursory glance, what they did here is not permitted by their own licence.

Comment Re:Iphones are not $99 (Score 1) 216

Actually, it's only $99 if you sign a two year contract and you aren't already an AT&T customer. Otherwise, not only do you have to pay significantly more ("discounted" prices of $300 for a 3G, $400 or $500 for a 3GS), you also have to pay an "upgrade fee" of $18, and sign a new two-year contract. Every other phone AT&T offers only requires a set price for current customers, making the iPhone essentially unavailable to us.

If I wanted an iPhone, it would actually be significantly cheaper for me to cancel my account and open a new one. Luckily, I'm quite happy with the e51 I bought myself.

Comment Guaranteed? (Score 4, Insightful) 191

Apparently the advertisers haven't heard about window managers and multitasking operating systems... especially since Hulu goes so far as to tell the viewer how long the commercial will be.

Then again, since Hulu commercial breaks are so short compared to those on television, there is far less of an incentive to do something else.

Comment Re:Who uses vanilla FF anyway? (Score 1) 505

It isn't, but vimperator does seem to be unique in having full keyboard-only navigation that is actually efficient and usable, and that can actually be faster than using a mouse. Most "full keyboard-only navigation" designs seem to be very poorly thought out, and meant for people who *can't* use the mouse, rather than people who want something faster.

Comment Re:Fun Read? (Score 1) 397

Strunk and White is the apocryphal text of degenerate grammatical crackpots, unable to truly understand the divine beauty of the English language!

I can only assume that you are but a casual follower of this particular heretical sect, as your commentary on verbosity, while quite correct in truth, is not typical of a Strunk and White believer. Also, you make use of adjectives, those glorious things that are so unjustly denounced as vices by the false prophets while they yet use them. Thus, I must implore you to reject their insidious words before you are utterly brainwashed into following them and endangering your immortal soul!

Comment Re:Will there be no wiki truths? (Score 1, Interesting) 439

I have to respond to this, because while you make some valid points, you're also misrepresenting a number of things.

The censorship on Wikipedia of sites like WR surrounds Wikipedia's consideration for its users' privacy. Sites like WR frequently have users who will delve into the personal lives of editors they happen to dislike, and try to publish as much information as possible, in ways verging on harassment. In addition, having their identities revealed can cause a number of problems for the editors: I know Wikipedia editors who keep science articles free of crackpot theories, and they tend to keep their true identities hidden because otherwise crackpots would go after them with frivolous lawsuits and real world harassment of employers and family. The censorship is based around this, not around what people happen to dislike.

Also, while many threads on WR are useful, many others are not, having been created mainly by people who dislike Wikipedia for not pandering to their particular viewpoints, and thus go about trying to claim that everything about Wikipedia is bad. And while there are occasionally problems with RFCs, RfArb, ANI, RfD, and so on, I've generally found that, unless one is searching for problems, things typically work well. Reading only Wikipedia Review is like reading only news about criminals: it can easily give a very distorted view of reality.

The Internet

Wikimedia Simplifies By Moving To Ubuntu 215

David Gerard writes "Wikimedia, the organization that runs Wikipedia and associated sites, has moved its server infrastructure entirely to Ubuntu 8.04 from a hodge-podge of Ubuntu, Red Hat, and various Fedora versions. 400 servers were involved and the project has been going on for 2 years. (There's also a small amount of OpenSolaris on the backend. All open source!)"
Privacy

20 Hours a Month Reading Privacy Policies 161

Barence sends word of research out of Carnegie Mellon University calling for changes in the way Web sites present privacy policies. The researchers, one of whom is an EFF board member, calculated how long it would take the average user to read through the privacy policies of the sites visited in a year. The answer: 200 hours, at a hypothetical cost to the US economy of $365 billion, more than half the financial bailout package. Every year. The researchers propose that, if the industry can't make privacy policies easier to read or skim, then federal intervention may be needed. This resulted in the predictable cry of outrage from online executives. Here's the study (PDF).

Slashdot Top Deals

This file will self-destruct in five minutes.

Working...