Comment Re:lamest name ever (Score 2) 318
I'm holding out until Wascally Wabbit is released.
I'm holding out until Wascally Wabbit is weweased.
I'm holding out until Wascally Wabbit is released.
I'm holding out until Wascally Wabbit is weweased.
Verizon's the first, but watch Google and others to follow now that it's mainstreamed. We're all going to get put into consumer categories based on our online activities:
sports fan, shoe fetish, gear head, porn enthusiast
These will match up to categories of products which we will then see repeatedly everywhere we go until we get so paranoid we buy them just to feel normal.
It's like minority report, but as a for-profit business instead of a pre-crime intervention.
Maybe you should actually watch Minority Report.
I got a kick out of my young daughter who used to call Mandrake "Blue Hat"....
Moses did come down from the mountain caring some curiously rounded corner rectangular tablets after chatting with God. Moses was the first one to steal this idea.
I believe that God designed and manufactured those tablets. Moses was just a distributor.
Lots of phone makers were making phones that had Java apps on them before the iPhone. Most of those apps were garbage, though, and seemed mainly designed to provide the carrier with more cash.
So when it comes to smartphones - maybe "smart" refers not to the phone, but to the phone's owner. As in, they were smart enough not to buy a phone filled with those crappy Java apps.
No, I've seen a few and that's definitely NOT it.
Touch screens also have poor conveyance of intent.
You touch the screen - and that's about it. You can't hover with your fingers and then choose to click, you can't convey different intent (right-click, middle-click, other mouse buttons etc.) easily.
You also can't see what your clicking while you hold onto it if it's right under your finger.
While I'm sure the touchscreen has a bright future, the significant of the interface is currently being overstated - all the "cool stuff" ultimately will come from pairing touchscreens with other devices including traditional things like keyboards.
What if you touch the screen with your middle finger? That might work.
I believe you've hit the nail on the head. This is an iPhone concentric view point.
iPhone centric maybe?
2 gig of RAM to type a letter
A 64 bit letter!
I'm reminded of the rotary engine, used in some WWI aircraft. The crankshaft was stationary -- attached to the plane's firewall -- and the entire engine block, including the cylinders, rotated around it. (The propeller was attached to the engine block.) In this way, no flywheel was necessary (the block was its own flywheel), saving weight, and the engine was cooled naturally, by the air flow over the moving cylinders. I don't know how the engines were balanced.
In a similar manner, the Sandia Cooler moves the heatsink through the air, rather than the air through the heatsink. It's solving a different problem, but I've always been fond of contrarian thinking like this.
No, you're not.
Considering that Larry Ellison is buying himself a frikking island, perhaps the slap in the face finally pushed him into super-villainy...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/20/larry-ellisons-island-ora_n_1614130.html
Probably something along these lines: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GO3mccvTCs
100% as fast would be 1.0x. They said 100% faster, which is (x + 1.0x)
or x+x or 2x
Is there some reason that you wanted to made this more complicated than it needs to be?
Making Android look like Windoof is about as "cool" as sprinkling dry dogshit on your cappuccino.
Darn right, everyone knows it's better with the fresh stuff.
Don't forget we should be teaching biblical Pi instead of heathen devil math.
"And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one rim to the other it was round all about, and...a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about....And it was an hand breadth thick...." — First Kings, chapter 7, verses 23 and 26
Clearly Pi = 3 Sinners.
Why don't you tell me the EXACT value of Pi.... smart guy!
3 is a perfectly good approximation if you don't need high accuracy.
Perhaps you're just considering a specific country. According to Wikipedia, the overall world sex ratio is 101 males to 100 females. At birth, the ratio is more like 106 males to 100 females, though males die earlier than females, especially in their last years. (An aunt who used to be a delivery room nurse told me that female babies are generally stronger than males, so eg. a premature female has a higher chance of surviving.) Some cultures don't like girl babies, leading to infanticide or abortions, so the ratio can get artificially skewed; it also just seems to naturally vary a bit.
Almost everyone dies in their last year....
The computer is to the information industry roughly what the central power station is to the electrical industry. -- Peter Drucker