Comment Re:Camera gun (Score 1) 765
Part of the problem with tazer is that they are SO safe (statistically, not by opinion and anecdote) and SO effective, that police came to rely on their use TOO MUCH.
Time was, a cop had to hit you with a wooden stick repeatedly to get your submission, maybe get several cops with sticks.. Now, it is as simple as pulling a trigger, we can now employ 5'2" females as cops and they can simply tazer their way out of bad situations. No broken bones (compared to the wooden stick method). The threshold for use is so low, I can go straight from the show-of-force phase to ride-the-lightning. What a time-saver!
Multiply that by a couple hundred thousand cops and 300+ million people and no shit you get abuses. Because the tazer is SUCH an attractive option, it became the go-to less-lethal method, often even instead of de-escalation.
I'd hate to see technology enable cops to non-nonchalantly fire "disabling shots" from firearms into Joe Public's non-vital organs.
Luddite? I'm saddened by your personal attack.
"we need technology..."? I'm sorry, but people who buy guns can decide if that feature is "needed". There's probably some stuff that "we need" to put in your house, in your car, or in your computer.... but since YOU are buying your own house, car, and computer then "we" can go pound sand. I will decide what features my gun "needs", and to be honest that shit pretty much got ironed out by around 1911.