The music industry is a good example of that. With a single song you have a copyright for the owner of the musical score and a copyright for the owner of the lyrics (not necessarily the creators of the music and lyrics or the same owner for both). If anyone performs the song, you would need to pay a license fee to the owners for 75 years beyond the death of the author in some cases (often the owner had nothing to do with creating the music and none of the licensing fees go to the real artists or their families).
Next, you have a phonogram copyright on recordings of a performance (donated by a circle with a letter P inside it). This is the one that can go on forever. Record companies can release new copies of old music just before the old recording's copyright expires. The license fees to the owner of the song were already paid for the original performance, and since they are just re-releasing the same performance they don't have to pay another license fee. But they can claim a new extension to the phonogram copyright.
So, say you digitize a record whose copyright has expired and give it away for free on the internet. Record companies can muddy the waters enough to claim you just copied one of their re-releases instead of a public domain record. You are guilty until you can prove yourself innocent.
On the other hand, record collectors would say that without this behavior, old public domain recordings would be lost forever.
In the early 1980's the BBC made a drama called "Threads" which had occasional narration interrupting the story to explain the science behind the effects of nuclear war. Anyone who thinks nuclear war is winnable, or that we've never had enough nukes to destroy the world should watch it... the entire thing.
There are no lone-wolf heroes or other typical US movie industry bullcrap, just cold, stark, depressing realism. You can watch it for free on YouTube....
I have also heard the same from manager types in private sector, non-military companies. They had told me in no uncertain terms that they equate ex-military with slackers that have an endless variety of ways of getting out of doing any meaningful work. They claimed this was based entirely on past experience of hiring ex-military.
In my own experience I can remember only three times were I worked with ex-military guys (probably only 3 because I've always worked in the private sector, except for one brief job with a military contractor). One guy was my manager, and he was an unnecessary-forms-and-reports generator machine. When I approached him with ideas for simplified reporting that killed fewer trees, his response was that he wanted tons of paperwork for two reasons, one was to make it look like a lot of work was getting done, the other was to obfuscate what was being done so in case something went wrong he could cover his ass.
The other two were tech level employees both of whom had endless stories about how guys in the military would get out of doing work. So maybe there is something to what those managers were saying.
(incidentally, all of the above (minus exotic materials) would be solved by using fuel cells in an EV car, if they can get them to not gunk up after a while and bring down the cost).
My impression of fuel cells is that they aren't very energy efficient when you take into consideration the energy required to make them and/or the electrolyte they use. They are just compact and light weight for special applications, such as near earth space craft. For example, the energy required to produce the hydrogen needed for a hydrogen fuel cell, usually by breaking bonds in H2O, is much greater than the energy you get out of the fuel cell in using that hydrogen. It's more efficient to just directly use the energy that would have gone in to producing the hydrogen. Fuel cells have been around since the early 1800's. If they were such a great primary energy source, wouldn't they be in use everywhere after 175 years?
...or maybe his problem with eye strain have something to do with staring, wide-eyed, at a single object, in a florescent light, dry, air-conditioned environment for 8 hours a day while on a steady diet of diuretics like sugary caffeinated substances.
I did not see anything in the summary to indicate that jones_supa had positively identified the LED backlight as the source of his problems to the exclusion of all else.
Manual labor wouldn't have an effect on corn and squash. Both of those are mechanized crops. Illegals are used to pick labor intensive crops like berries.
Not in this case. This family farms on several separate fields that vary in size from 1 to 5 acres, which they lease from the landowners. They use machinery to plow, fertilize, and spray. But I've never seen them use machinery to harvest. Usually it's just a few laborers pulling up in a pickup truck with a bunch of cardboard boxes and going at it.
They never harvest one corn field near a public road. Instead, they let it dry out, and in Oct/Nov turn it into a corn maze that they charge admission to.
So unless it's subsides or a money laundering operation, I have no idea how they've stayed in business for so many generations.
"Don't try to outweird me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you free with my breakfast cereal." - Zaphod Beeblebrox in "Hithiker's Guide to the Galaxy"