Comment Re:So what? (Score 1) 678
Those other things shouldn't be censored either. How does one "deal with it" exactly?
Those other things shouldn't be censored either. How does one "deal with it" exactly?
The unreasonable part isn't the watching. It's perfectly reasonable to watch something knowing it might offend you, and indeed sometimes we are exposed to offensive things without foreknowledge.
The unreasonable part is hurting someone because of an idea.
Saudi Arabia is a lot like the entertainment industry. Neat!
Even more than why anyone would pay for this I wonder why all the tech sites are running this. Slow news day I guess?
...seeds jail YOU.
Ya I've heard mixed information on whether NFC is on by default or not. Either way there's still a web exploit on both which means Android is at best no more secure, and at worse, less.
It is indeed. The difference is your average Joe is fairly likely to know now that he shouldn't click on a link from an unknown address, or his email AV will have sanitized it first. Even if he keeps NFC turned off most of the time (which is not the default) he'll still have to turn it on to, for example, pay for something, and I think that's when it will be most dangerous.
The idea being that it's ok to have an insecure wireless interface on your smartphone as long as you don't have to be *too* close to it for it to work?
NFC stations are not usually on other people, they're in stores and random other places that entice you to use it. A hacked or augmented genuine NFC reader could be made to steal your data, for example.
They both have web exploits but the Android variety can be triggered simply by being nearby an attacker. The iOS one needs a tricked user.
They're just dropdowns, works fine.
Totally agree.
On it.
If people expect treating each other like strangers on the subway will make a better workplace, and if the company only promotes lax, lazy, quiet, and completely unstimulating environment - well, i can understand the divas better then the people that fail to *care*.
Hear, hear!
UK "justice" is pretty messed up - a private entity can prosecute individuals.
Ars has a great article about how FACT put the owner of SurfTheChannel behind bars for four years. Maybe this is why UKNova are complying with these idiots.
This should be +5, best post here.
Happiness is twin floppies.