Comment Re:those ARE a problem. Mechanisms, not results (Score 1) 263
We agree that you shouldn't be able to patent something if it's obvious or someone else did it first.
> The specific method you developed. Sure, that might mean an alternative method is trivial to develop and you get nothing - but guess what? All that means is that your "invention" was trivial in the first place.
This argument is invalid. Sure, seeing a particular invention and seeing the result it gets, it may then be obvious how to achieve that same result by alternative methods. But it doesn't follow that the invention itself is trivial. This is precisely why patents can't just cover mechanisms.