Comment Re:Makes sense... (Score 1) 341
I make that closer to 50Tbit/s for the two video panels.
But why so old-skool?
120Hz is already out of date. Let's play with 300Hz. TVs claim more, it's all same order of magnitude though.
Decent uncompressed holography, 200nm pixels, is about 125kPPI. Let's stick with 32-bit, only need one channel though.
Something you can point a telescope at and still see the details.
And you obviously want a holo-video wall in each bedroom for chatting, not a mere window.
Let's call it 8 feet by 12 feet, or 30,000 square inches per person.
I make that a cool 28 x 10^18 = 28 million Tbit/s = 28 Ebit/s, per person, for home use, if you don't compress.
More up-market houses will want a dedicated holo-conferencing / work-at-home room, and of course pictures of the sky on the ceilings as well as other decorative surfaces. So there's still a market premium for Zettabit links.
That's nice for chatting, parties, pretty sky pictures etc. but anyone doing scientific or computational research at home will want a proper pipe for their off site backups.
(Obviously we would compress all the above heavily, but that's harder to evaluate.)