Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Why not just license it? (Score 1) 268

Because, no matter how they try, they aren't one of the original writers, living in the same timeframe, experiencing the same world that the writer was. This script presumably in some way is influenced by the era in which it was written. This is the work that I would want to see performed, as it would be more like the Original Series. While I've enjoyed the New Voyages episodes, this would have been a great opportunity to see something that CBS will simply let rot until it is forgotten and too late.

Comment Why not just license it? (Score 5, Interesting) 268

Why can't CBS just license it for a dollar? Copyright is enforced, license is legit, fans get something that CBS must know they're never going to do anything with. How many unproduced scripts can they have? Would they really ever re-make the series using the old scripts and use this one? Greed, pure and simple. "If we can't use it, nobody can"

We seriously need copyright reform. Copyright terms should be 14 years again. I think as a society, the we (the US) should just ignore copyrights after that time.

Comment Re:Rushing?! For What?! (Score 1) 446

I had to buy a textbook twice, as the classes were structured to use one half one semester, and the other the next. The next year, they changed which version we were using. I compared the books. The two most notable differences, page after page where this: 1) The homework problems were all SLIGHTLY different (some numbers tweaked, or sometimes just in a different order) 2) All blue graphs were now red and all red graphs were now blue. WTF???

I am sure there were some other fixes and such, but why change all the problems? Answer: because then wouldn't actually need to buy the new version. They wish to kill the used market.

Comment Re:Adobe complaining about bloat? (Score 1) 477

An application should not ask you whether "you really want to quit" you already told it that - instead it should make sure that when you quit nothing bad happens. If you were working on a document but didn't save that yet - then just keep the working copy when the program is closed. Don't overwrite what's in the saved copy and don't throw it away - just restore it when the application is opened again, and suddenly quitting word processor is no longer dangerous. When quitting a music or video player it should remember what you were playing and come back to that when the application is started again. A video player should keep the position basically for every movie it has been playing, so if you come back to it later you can continue to watch from the same position, even if you have watched something else in between.

This will just add further bloat.You want applications to start instantly, but you want them to load even more information at startup and save even more at every shutdown. Just ask the user if they want to continue later, or remind them that they need to save. Should my media player really need to automatically remember that I closed every episode of my favorite tv show just before the credits began?

Comment Re:More shit for the tip (dump). (Score 1) 463

For starters it will allow you to host a bunch of services on different machines without having to put them all on weird ass ports because you only have a single ip. Peer to peer software will work as intended without nasty hacks to poke holes through the nat.

Well, on my home network, I'd want everything from the outside firewalled unless I initiated the connection. (Kinda like what NAT does). How will peer2peer software work in this case? By punching holes in the firewall using nasty hacks? Serious question.

Slashdot Top Deals

A computer scientist is someone who fixes things that aren't broken.

Working...