1) From your text:
"While the criminal code does not appear to expressly address same-sex sexuality or cross-dressing, there is no visible LGBT community in North Korea and no LGBT rights movement"
Further it clarifies that public display of affection is against tradition regardless of sex and sexual orientation
Deduce that:
a) LGBT is not illegal b) North Koreans are very conservative.
which is something I already knew. Ok they're stuck with tradition, that doesn't mean that gays are outlawed.
The view that "gay traits" are connected to feebleness or capitalism may be idiotic but does not classify as gay repression.
2) Detail: "US ex-president Jimmy Carter reported that" -- that demolishes any credibility. Though if the fact that NK are 5' shorter than SK is strong indication, if I'd feel the research was not biased. Which may be, since wikipedia does NOT cite reference! (violation of WP rules, isn't it?) -- Anyway, I frequently watch reports from BBC and people are certainly do not seem malnourished.
3) From wikipedia:
"The Daily NK is an online newspaper focusing on issues relating to North Korea. The site, run by opponents of the North Korean government, is based in South Korea and regularly reports stories from inside North Korea via a network of informants inside the country.[1]"
Still I read it. It says that free education collapsed in 90's. May be true, but:
a) America does not have free education at all. $45,000 a year in an American university is way too much when the dept in France I am applying for postgrad studies wants €250 and an equivalent in EPFL in Lausanne wants ~600CHF. Even in your country, a postgrad programme costs $5000/yr.
b) It would be totally reasonable, since the fall of socialism (which happened that exactly period) deprived NK most its allies and radically worsened its economic status.
A quote: "It is impossible for schools to solve their heating problems without state support during the winter, but they do their best by forcing students to give firewood, coal or money."
That actually happens in Greece now. It's actually better than that what I was raised. I had NO heating at all in my school of ANY kind. So no use to bring fuel from home.
3) I didn't even know that parties can be elected. I thought that only Worker's Party was legal. So practically you enforced my position by revealing that there are elections even for high posts. Ok, not totally free since they're not entirely secret, but even that way, it allows to have 4 parties in the Assembly. I personally was referring to low and mid key posts, like municipalities and local governors.
Not to forget to mention that in America there are essentially only two parties representing the exact same political stance ("The Business Party" as called by Chomski), differing only in religious matters like abortion. Even in the Banana Republic of Greece (as we jokingly some refer to it, bananas refer to colonialism), we have a communist, a far-left, a center-right, a right-wing, previously a far right-wing and a far-far-far extremist right-wing nazi party in the parliament.
4) Please specify where my info was wrong.
5) It's called ROC by WHO? Only themselves use that term. Even the WP article you gave me, actually redirects to "Taiwan"! From the article, only 22 UN members have even official relationships with Taiwan. Even themselves, in their last bid at the UN for recognition (which of course failed), they used the term "Taiwan" and not "ROC".
It would be useful to mention that the credentials transfer to PRC from ROC/Taiwan was made by the UN General Assembly (which represents everyone) and not the Security Council (which effectively represents only the interest of 5 countries)
6) And a question. Does the UK belong to "Free World" according to your views? I mean they have as colonies the 1/3 of the world just a few decades ago. Can they still be classified as a country promoting freedom?
ps: That would be interesting why do you believe all the Greeks sound alike. Probably far less pro-West?