I use the RT score as a useful indicator, not always the final word. If a collective score is 40 or below, I probably won't waste my time on that movie. If it's 70 or above, then I know that the overall opinion is favorable and my interest will be confirmed. (That warned me away from last year's Passengers, and sent me to see this year's Colossal.) In the 40-70 gray zone, I'll probably save my money and wait a few months until I can stream it or rent the DVD from Redbox. But this isn't the behavior that the studios want, so RT and Metacritic make useful scapegoats. We all have many options for entertainment and spare time activities, so we're not going to waste our time and money on bad flicks.
Incidentally, while the studios are moaning about the negative impact of collective wisdom on the Web, they should also be joyous about the greatly expanded worldwide market for their marketing messages. In the past, American movies were released overseas long after their runs here, fewer of them were subtitled/dubbed for international markets, and international grosses were small. Today, international releases are synchronized with the domestic one. Sequels like Furious 8 and Pirates 5 earn much more money internationally than domestically, since they feature international stars who are basically review-proof. Studios release movies straight to DVD or to streaming; there's no reason they couldn't release movies straight to international markets without a domestic release. Pirates 6 anyone?
As we look around the world, though, it's clear that there are many thousands of academics in universities of varying quality who would also like to have their work published, even if it's not in, for example, one of the ACM's or IEEE's Transactions journals. So we now have a slew of journals focused on computer science, some of which are, to be polite, not very selective about what they publish, as long as the authors pay the publication fee. There are also more and more low-quality journals that publish online using an open access approach. Many of these journals use highly credible names, and it's easy for a novice to confuse them with well-known and higher-quality journals. If you do a search on "fake journals in computer science', you will see that there are hundreds of such journals; if you go to the web page for such a journal, it looks real, complete with editorial board members who hold academic positions. Life would be simpler if these fake journals didn't exist, but most of them seem to find enough paying authors to put out new volumes of their journals. If your papers are continually rejected by the program committees for various conferences, this may be the only way to publish your work, even if it's not very good. Indeed, some of these journals have published papers that were generated by bots.
In principle, there is nothing wrong with submitting your work to be published in one of these fake journals. You can tell your Mom that you are a published author, and you can include this "publication" on your CV, but it won't help you to become a full Professor at a reputable university.
If you are not an academic at an institution that evaluates your publication record for promotion, then this whole process probably seems silly to you. In that case, you can view the promotion process as a game where you play by certain established rules, just as people in industry tend to play by a different set of rules to get promoted and earn raises.
The good news is that the Cuban government isn't blocking access to websites, and that smartphones are becoming more widely available, but the absence of alternatives to ETECSA means that costs are likely to remain prohibitive for the vast majority of Cubans for the foreseeable future.
Side note: Knuth's books predated electronic publishing and were typeset, necessitating careful proofing of the galleys prior to publication and many months of delay between completion of the manuscript and actual publication of the book. The errors made by human typesetters weren't always caught, which led to bugs in the published book (and in some of the algorithms and code). Knuth offered a reward of $1.00 to anyone who was the first to find and report an error. No email then, so you had to write a letter or make an expensive long distance phone call. Knuth actually sent out hand-signed written checks, but not many people cashed them, preferring instead to display the signed check as proof that they had found an error in one of these volumes. If you were wondering about Knuth's inspiration for creating LaTEX, this note should help explain that.
As for the telecom issue, there are two key issues for the Cubans. The first is that there is very limited bandwidth for Internet access. Cuba just doesn't have enough high-sped satellite or undersea connections to allow video streaming and other high-bandwidth uses. Instead, someone will burn DVDs with movies and other content, then share them with others. It's like the old sneaker-net. So ETECSA (or its successor) will have to address the bandwidth issue before Cuba can have better Internet access. The proposal for the cable to Florida seems like a good start.
The second issue is limited public access to the Internet. If you are at the UCI (Computer science university), it's easy to get on the Internet from their machines, which run Nova, a UCI-developed Linux distro. Home computers with network access are extremely rare, so most people wanting to get onto the Internet must go to an ETECSA-run center and pay for access. The rate is about $2 US/hour, payable only in "hard" currency CUCs, extremely high in a country where average monthly salary is about $25. Overall, the estimate is that about 3% of the Cuban population is on the Internet, mostly through ETESCA's nauta.cu portal.The situation isn't any better with mobile phones, where ETECSA hasn't yet reached 3G speeds and there are no data plans. More info on the ETECSA site (in Spanish).
Aaron Levie of Box tweeted that if the California DMV existed when cars first hit the road, then they would have required Ford to include a horse in each car. Exactly right.
There will come a point down the road (sorry for the pun) when my wife and I will no longer be able to pass a driving test and thus drive. Rather than being stuck at home, as is now the case for many people, I want to be able to call up a driverless car in the same way that I would call a car service today, and then use it for point-to-point local transportation. While I greatly enjoy the opportunity to drive myself around, I'm not going to need a steering wheel or normal pedals in that situation. An emergency brake and a web-connected alarm, a la OnStar, will be enough. I hope that the legislatures in other states don't follow the erroneous lead of California.
But I'm afraid that it won't convince "the average Joe/Jane that their nice safe middle class office job isn't so safe." That's because the average Joe or Jane doesn't read newspapers much anymore, and they certainly don't read the Times. I also suspect that Joe and Jane, if they or their family members have salaried jobs, have already seen this situation and perhaps been affected by it. If you want to get the message out, then it has to get to the cable news channels, where it can be explained in basic English and illustrated by a couple of interviews. The extreme right-wing is already against the H1B program for its own reasons.
When you combine the H1B assault on the middle class, with the "workforce optimization" programs used for hourly staff, you get a severe squeeze on all workers, which helps to explain why so few people outside the 1% feel secure in their jobs and their lives.
"Who alone has reason to *lie himself out* of actuality? He who *suffers* from it." -- Friedrich Nietzsche