My tabs are open for a reason even if I don't use them every day. Don't mess with them

The UI used to be so clean and lightweight and efficient and ergonomic. I miss old Gmail. Still convenient but worse than it was.

I got my account when it was still invite only. It's hard to explain how vastly superior it was to any webmail that preceded it. It really was mind-blowing.

I haven't watched the series yet but the books really blew me away, highly recommended for any sci-fi reader. It has some really epic ideas. I still think about those often, years after reading them.

Well good thing that this technology will somehow never improve any further, glad all of our jobs are safe

And when the AI does a better job than any human ever could, who do we complain to?

Three adversary you describe is one we could in one way or another outsmart. Destroy it, unplug it, fight a war against its kill it's - that's all fine if we're smarter than it is. If it's much smarter than we are, it's kind of like a chess amateur thinking he'll outwit stockfish with his good old human ingenuity.

Isn't that what you do too? ;)

That's what a transformer is (although it's obviously a very dismissive way to describe something much more clever than a conditional jump). Then the transformer trains the LLM, but we have no idea how the LLM works or how to reliably make it do one thing but not another. The LLM part, the black box part, is the dangerous bit.

I'll grant you that the 128 bit AACS encryption key and a set of 1.76 trillion floating point numbers that actually fucking thinks could both be referred to as "numbers". But would you be open to considering that the latter isn't as easy to spread, nor as harmless?

I don't understand why you assume that this brand new technology will not improve.

âoeThe energy produced by breaking down the atom is a very poor kind of thing. Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformations of these atoms is talking moonshine.â Lord Ernest Rutherford, 1933.

Agents of human level intelligence with the ability to improve themselves lead to an intelligence explosion, the resulting thing wants to continue existing and acquire resources because instrumental convergence, it has inscrutable goals because orthogonality thesis, these goals have no reason to involve human survival, it absent mindedly kills us all in the pursuit of is goals. Could you clarify which part is not plausible?

You have that analogy backwards. You're the bacteria in this case. And that's not a worst case scenario.

> How is it that pictures are executable? Pictures can be executed (well technically interpreted I guess) because the code for the interpreter is plain English and also you can ask the interpreter to describe what he sees in a jpeg.

> Disallow the entire class of meta queries. Do not allow alternative prompts and other self references. That's not how any of this works

Would be? I think you mean "is"