Comment Re: No actually not (Score 2) 257
Does it make sense to build newer reactors to burn out the old waste down to the 200 year safety mark then decom the reactor?
I think this should in the plans to get the waste into a safer situation.
Does it make sense to build newer reactors to burn out the old waste down to the 200 year safety mark then decom the reactor?
I think this should in the plans to get the waste into a safer situation.
I don't believe just solar and wind solve this either.
We need intelligent thought into alternative ways to produce energy. We need to distribute the energy load across as many sources as possible.
Meaning we need solar panels on all roofs. We need small windmills where we can. Rivers with hydro, that don't block the whole river and destroy the ecosystem. Tidal generation on the coasts. And new tractors to try and consume all the waste from the older plants.
Only when I see a balanced plan would I believe that someone has thought this through. But when shit goes south the always blame the engineer... Never the political party or CEO who really pulled the strings.
Already done. Wyse terminals and thinlinux.
Canonical and redhat don't take phone calls?
Some people still have to stock those stores, and in cases like this we still get a herd going in and cleaning the place out, the bottle neck still becomes getting the resources to where they can be distributed.
The other part that is despicable with China, they are forcing people back to work to re-open factories because they fear losing control and they fear the economic actions if other countries bring production back to their home shores.
Chinese companies have already been caught selling fake tests, what is next?
I think your missing people's points here, we know people will die, but have some sort of empathy towards it. What would happen if we could flatten it out and possibly only 10k people die? That is the goal here. Flatten it out and spread it out so we don't have to make decisions on who should die. Having a level of empathy towards an event of this magnitude and being able to put this all in perspective is kind of a rare trait.
So being confident in the people you hire is bad? I'll let your boss know.
Trump is an different, but come on, the guy is trying to hold a brave face knowing how bad we really are. Do you think he isn't like every other politician at this point?
With the push to electric cars.... We might need some power at night to feed all these batteries.
Letting the problem work itself out, we don't like confrontation.
Wonder if Milton found his red stapler?
screws up computer security in 5.. 4... too late.
It's ok there is nothing personal in there
That is assuming you have time to get a wallet or purse. I don't know where you live but homes here are often wood, they go up pretty farking quickly. As a victim of a house fire, I can tell you, you are not searching for a wallet and pant, your getting your kids and S/O and maybe pets and getting your ass out of the house.
I almost modded this as funny, but then I thought you may be serious. And thought wow, this person must be a manager or VP of IT, because they are doing the single most dumbest thing I have ever heard. Let me guess, 2FA is useless also ?
In case of a fire where is your backup so you can get into your bank and order new cards, so you can ya know sleep on something other then a cardboard box down by the river? Is it in your parents office drawer upstairs?
I mean really, $4 per user ? Sounds like Brazil shaking down Facebook for pocket change. Bet the money goes missing once it hit the government bank account. The corruption down there is astounding.
We want to create puppets that pull their own strings. - Ann Marion