Comment Why is this a bad thing? (Score 1) 44
By not printing the worthless tickets, they were acting in the interest of the environment. Good for them!
By not printing the worthless tickets, they were acting in the interest of the environment. Good for them!
Who needs a 98 inch screen, when you can have a 360 degrees view on an Oculus Rift?
No hostage here !
Indeed. The original argument is like saying: my bakery is keeping my loaf of bread hostage until I pay for it.
There are many projects that look similar on the surface, but aren't technically as sound as this project.
If you don't agree, then please provide counter-examples
You must be one of those executive types thinking all programmers should work for free.
Overfishing. Combined with the fact that sharks have to eat something.
Quite an interesting movie.
No worries people, because drivers will soon become obsolete anyway...
Indeed. If you do A = B + C, where A is the new technology, and B and C are existing technologies, then the operation "+" should be sufficiently advanced for the patent on A to be approved.
And here I thought that they would be making trucks filled with concrete and with big nozzles attached that could print houses, roads and bridges...
This guy was trying a new editor named "vi", but didn't know how to properly exit it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
I don't understand the "defusing" of a kitten by a laser pointer...
Didn't Feyman once say:
If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics.
When Linux was first introduced, your response was probably: sigh, another operating system. I've been using Windows for over 10 years now.
what you're seeing is that when a company becomes dominant, its dominance precludes it from dominating the next thing. It's almost like a natural law of business.
You mean like how Google, after it dominated search, didn't dominate web-based e-mail, and online videos?
Science and religion are in full accord but science and faith are in complete discord.