Comment DHS Precrime Division (Score 1) 59
Not sure why the thought of the Precime Division from Minority Report popped in my head but yeah, given enough time on the AI path we may end up with such a scenario.
Not sure why the thought of the Precime Division from Minority Report popped in my head but yeah, given enough time on the AI path we may end up with such a scenario.
You take exception with that and I'm annoyed by the phrase "Finally Nearly Here"...
Probably the only thing that got them truly hemmed up was the Piracy as a Service model, although I'm still trying to grasp the logic in how the US Postal Inspection Service came to be the lead in this whole matter. Is this the new route around overburdened bureaucracy of the other 3LAs?
OpenSSL 3.0.7 is a security-fix release. The highest severity issue fixed in this release is CRITICAL: https://www.openssl.org/policies/general/security-policy.html
Most likely unrelated but perhaps relevant: Two weeks ago, OpenSSL 3.0.6 was released and then completely retracted within 24 hours due to "a significant regression" in the software.
It's one thing to require a GPS tracking bracelet on a person for pre-trial supervision or even as a term of probation for a limited term but to enable communication through that device... that is too far in the name of "justice".
I could easily see such technology being used without prior notice of the monitored to listen in on private communications, even privileged communications such as with a lawyer or counselor; this is of course not to mention the fact that such monitoring could be used to build a greater case against an individual based upon recordings. It's not unheard of for this here on Slashdot for company provided monitoring to be abused and misused, it's also not unheard of for such systems to be compromised by third-parties for malicious purposes such as covert surveillance or harassment so, is it a stretch to believe that such could likely happen with this particular practice?
Why is GPS/location monitoring not enough? What sound justification could be made for more than that for legal reasons? These are children, not spies, not enemies of the state and even if such features could lead to greater security for society, is that a society that you could reasonably say you'd prefer if it was your child or yourself?
I was the same way except my first encounter with a YouTube ad was on the phone... shortly after I found modifying DNS worked wonders since I am on WiFI 95% of the time anyways.
That's great for you and all, but almost every PC game that has ever been released is a testament to why Wine is still necessary (even if not necessary for some).
My words only express my experience, nothing more and nothing less.
I encourage those whom play Windows games to use Wine, to get Crossover Games and tell the game publishers, if you have a problem, call it in to support, go to their forums, make a little bit of noise showing your support for the game and your platform of choice, just don't be insane about it.
By all means use the tools available and work to make them better, give your feedback and help support those who work to support your gaming. Don't think that just because you've switched that you can't continue to enjoy your computer as you've done in the past.
And while it may not be perfect, if you're adamant about it and help others on official forums, you show that the market can be viable and that the risk for exploring it can be negligible especially given our normal distribution methods for software over the Internet.
Gosh, you're SO L33T!
Why do you think the rest of us care?
I know its bad to feed the trolls but here's a thought...
My experience has shown me that I don't need Windows apps as much as I though I needed them, I found better alternatives and while Wine is great at some point you just have to sit back and wonder, "Is it worth it?"
I went through updates which broke previously working applications, I went through configuration edit after edit for each application to get things working and at one point just decided to look for a better way. Don't get me wrong Wine is great for beginning Linux but it really shows the flaws in many Windows programs and with closed source, you can stumble onto one at random even if you're coding to established API for compatibility.
So why my comment? I commented because I felt it showed that Wine helps break the reliance on Windows applications, it's great for transition but not for long haul requirements and I'm not commenting for the sake of commenting, a review of my account can attest to that. You however seem to enjoy placing your finger up your rear trying to tickle the back of your throat hoping something worthwhile will eventually come out of your mouth.
Too bad it is a miss today for you but thankfully, I'm at least not an anonymous coward like you.
Long ago when I first switched to Linux I made the decision that I would not run a dual boot environment and would instead use Wine to run my apps I NEEDED from Windows on my Linux machine.
Fast forward six months from that switch, I removed the NEEDED applications because I found better ones (hello GnuCash) and haven't used a Windows application or required Wine since then, that was almost 3 or 4 years ago now when I fully switched my desktop to Linux.
As long as we're going to reinvent the wheel again, we might as well try making it round this time. - Mike Dennison