You take a stance of absolute security
I don't want absolute security. I do want reasonable security.
I want guns under lock and key except when ready to shoot.
I want gun users certified by passing a gun safety course that is no more intense than driver's ed.
I want background checks on all gun users, and background checks on gun owners.
I want limits on the total ammunition that can be loaded into a gun at a time.
I want limits on the total ammunition that a person can own.
I want guns under lock and key when transported.
I want public and private spaces to be able to ban guns on their site.
I want ammunition loaded only at authorized hunting grounds or designated shooting ranges.
I want carry licenses limited to people who *publicly* state the reason that they need an unlocked gun.
I want gun owners to carry liability insurance that pays out against any damage or death caused by their gun.
I want gun users to have proof of insurance with their gun, and that this proof is checked on every interaction with the government.
What I want are regulations that are completely in line with the limitations on vehicles and drivers. Importantly, none of these requirements limit your right to bear arms. They just codify the responsibilities that gun owners need to follow to keep the public safe.
rather than deprive the VAST, overwhelming majority of US citizens that are responsible gun owners
Only 36% of US households own guns. You are asking me to risk lunatics with guns when the VAST overwhelming majority of US citizens are NOT gun owners?
Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com...
Guns are great at killing things. They should be regulated just as any other dangerous object.
You take out the suicides alone and the numbers fall drastically.
I see no need to adjust the statistics by ignoring one of the most important elements. Suicide attempts with a gun are far more deadly than other methods. Reducing access to guns keeps people alive. I like keeping people alive.
might only reduce the overall death by firearms rate by 2-3%
I know automotive engineers who have dedicated their entire careers trying to reduce automotive deaths by less than 1%. I would be thrilled to reduce firearm deaths by 2-3%. The fact that you are OK with just letting people die is a position that I do not support. I would rather have those extra 2-3% survive than placate your desire to avoid oversight.
The uncomfortable truth is that two-thirds of all firearm related deaths are suicides and of the remaining third nearly a third of those have a victim that is a young black man who was killed by another young black man.
Why would anyone care about gender and skin color when we are talking about gun violence? Does it not matter when people die if they are of a specific gender or skin color?
I guess when you hear a drunk driver plows into a group of people and kills/mames many of them, your first call is to ban cars and alcohol, right?
No, you blame the driver....
I'm OK with licensing gun owners like drivers, guns like cars, and establishing laws about ammunition like alcohol.
We want to create puppets that pull their own strings. - Ann Marion