Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Daily (Score 1) 266

I agree that Time Machine is very simple, straightforward and handy. I've used it to both restore files and settings after a hard drive replacement, as well as find an older version of a current file.

I currently have a Mac Mini Server with a 2TB external drive. Time Machine backups of the Mac Mini Server go on the drive. Additionally, with my wife and I have user accounts on the server, so our Macbook Air/Pro laptops are also "Time Machined" to the external drive thru the server. The only worries I have are: 1) the external drive simultaneously failing with one of the Time Machined Macs (not too likely?), and 2) the house catching fire (also not very likely?)

I simply don't have an off-site backup. Is that foolish? I've thought about putting an identical Mac Mini Server / 2TB setup off-site about 10 miles away at my in-laws' house, but is that really necessary? Does Time Machine work over the internet?

Comment Re:Fascinating Proposition (Score 1) 480

Parent post recommended a high-quality bed, and specifically mentioned Select Comfort (Sleep Number) by name.

My wife and I purchased a Sleep Number bed a little over 2 years ago. I have mixed feelings. The positive side is that we each have control over the firmness/softness of our respective sides of the bed. Therefore, we sleep great. Having that customizability is infinitely better than our prior bed which was too soft for me and too firm for her. If you have someone sharing your bed, "sleep number" is the way to go to keep you both happy, if you have differing opinions on mattress firmness/softness.

Now for the bad. Two years ago, we purchased the Select Comfort Sleep Number 7000 series, king size, for around $4000. Honestly, I'm disappointed with what came in the boxes. As you assemble the bed yourself, you realize that you're looking at a trivial amount of material. Now, maybe the fully assembled bed is worth more than the sum of its parts, but $4000 is a lot of money.

At the time that we were considering the Sleep Number bed made by Select Comfort, my internet research revealed the Sleep Better Store, which essentially is a copycat company who makes an adjustable air-mattress style bed, but because they don't have showrooms, high-pressure sales people, etc., and only sell via telephone and internet, they purportedly offer comparable products at much lower prices. However, my wife was seduced by the branding and name-recognition that Select Comfort has garnered over the years through its showrooms, TV commercials, and QVC appearances, so we went with the "name brand". Having seen what really goes into the construction of one of these beds, I will strongly lobby for the Sleep Better or some other copycat brand in the future in order to save some money. I think the key is the adjustability of firmness provided by the air chambers. Heck, I suspect that you could be very happy by going with an "entry level" Sleep Number-style bed and putting a nice featherbed or other plush mattress cover on top, rather than going with the super-expsensive "top of the line" models....

Just my two cents.

Comment Re:Cool, but... (Score 2, Informative) 220

I too have astigmatism and can wear Toric lenses to (mostly) correct it. Been wearing them for several years now, and I'm pretty sure my astigmatism is pretty bad. Never been recommended hard lenses. Perhaps your eye doctor is just old and not up to date? Or maybe I'm wrong in that only mild astigmatism can be corrected in soft lenses.

Comment TuneCore is great! (Score 3, Interesting) 291

In law school, a bunch of us formed "The Learned Hands" and laid down some tracks. I had seen an ad for TuneCore somewhere on the web, so we uploaded our album for distribution. Sadly, having graduated school, the band no longer exists, but it's cool to say that our original music has been heard in Germany and the UK (Someone streamed "Ten Point Buck" and "Sleepy Hollow").

My experience with TuneCore was great! The initial costs were very low - I think it's like a dollar per track, and a dollar per online music store. And what do you know, our music is available on iTunes, Napster, Rhapsody, eMusic, all over the world! Depending on the vendor, you get one or two cents every time the song is streamed, and for downloads, it's usually 65% or 70% of the purchase price. Uploaded the tracks in FLAC format too, actually, and everything turned out swell.

This is the type of innovation that is changing the music industry, and I don't think the RIAA knows how to, or even can, keep up.

1. Record your album in your garage/basement
2. Upload your tracks to TuneCore for distribution
3. ???
4. Profit!

The problem for my band has been step three, since we no longer officially exist (Singers are in CO and Philly, bassist in VT, and I'm moving to BFE), but we did sell 3 copies on AmazonMP3 and a few tracks on iTunes, plus about $0.76 worth of streaming on Napster and Rhapsody.

In conclusion, TuneCore allows Joe Sixpack to (sort of) achieve his rockstar dreams, at least in terms of getting the music out there and making it available.
Software

An Open Source Legal Breakthrough 292

jammag writes "Open source advocate Bruce Perens writes in Datamation about a major court victory for open source: 'An appeals court has erased most of the doubt around Open Source licensing, permanently, in a decision that was extremely favorable toward projects like GNU, Creative Commons, Wikipedia, and Linux.' The case, Jacobsen v. Katzer, revolved around free software coded by Bob Jacobsen that Katzer used in a proprietary application and then patented. When Katzer started sending invoices to Jacobsen (for what was essentially Jacobsen's own work), Jacobsen took the case to court and scored a victory that — for the first time — lays down a legal foundation for the protection of open source developers. The case hasn't generated as many headlines as it should."

Slashdot Top Deals

Mystics always hope that science will some day overtake them. -- Booth Tarkington

Working...