Comment As a professional photographer (Score 1) 68
As a professional photographer i can only applaud for this.
Allthough i create distinguishing images, i depend more on the licensing of images.
As a professional photographer i can only applaud for this.
Allthough i create distinguishing images, i depend more on the licensing of images.
I wonder if they will do this for the 120, 220, 4x5, 8x10....or only 35 mm...
Especially in the medium format resolution is still higher and there are only croppped digital medium format-sensors
looking forward in any case!
Depends if the make-up-artist created the design, a novel design that is
It will become more difficult...if another artist will license the same footage, Youtube's automatic process will flag this new work as well as "copyright-infringement" so any licensee will get the same TDN.....
in fact the bizarre situation could be that any other licensee could do the same to Sony!
....
The only reason they're still allowed to use the video is because they accepted a secondary deal that explicitly credits him and his website on their video, even if it took them days to get that done.
Actually they mentioned him as a creator not as a copyright-holder....those are 2 separate things. Correctly they should have mentioned : "Licensed from © Mitch Martinez"
In the case they would acquire full copyright, they should still legally mention the creator.... so would be in this case creator Mitch Martinez/© Sony Music Entertainment.......
Sony DOES own the copyright over the total project, but doesn't have the total copyright as it's a gradual distribution of copy-rights.....
If i would be photographing fashion-models....the clothing is copyrighted, and the work of the fashion-stylist is copyrighted and the work of the make-up-artist is copyrighted.....I would own the copyright of the image but can not claim the copyright of the others....
hmm...was not logged in
re-quote for points
well...the copyright owner of the whole production is Sony, so far they are correct....it's what they call a gradual copyright..it's based on work that depends on other copyrights...
Lol...enough non-americans here....who can't be called traitors in any case..
US used to be "Land of the Free"...with very strong conditions not allowing the government to become a tyranny, among: The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures." Seizure – the taking of private information"
Apparently you are the traitor to your own constitution...I guess it will be come down between Snowden's Constitution and Obma's Constitution
and to speak with Benjamin Franklin... "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both"
He tells me...
(And, certainly, it seems, here in the UK, that even MEPs keen on the principle don't really know how this ruling will work in practice or what the wider consequences will be. Video here.
Why did the Roman Empire collapse? What is the Latin for office automation?