It was an experiment to build "communism" within the confines of the corporation: satisfy people's all basic needs and they will work harder and be productive. It failed. Again. While some people worked harder, it eventually attracted majority who exploited the situation for their own gain or pleasure.

If you want to take action, you can book a conference room or go outside and protest. When you block common areas or occupy offices, this is intimidation and harassments. Grounds for termination. It is all in the employee training and handbook.

Commits in question: Terraform vs Opentofu

It appears that the proposed legislation will not get them them money but deprive them of traffic and ads revenue instead. This is not entirely unexpected. California legislature passes tons of "feel good" laws that backfire spectacularly.

It is a slippery slope. If Cox is liable for user's copyright infringement then Tesla is liable for drivers speeding. Next, they will disable your car remotely for repeated violations.

The problem is that "others" want to fix the problem themselves but government regulation don't allow it.

They did replace "Air Men" with "Air Missions". The system is still broken though.

Most Libertarians know that the government is a large bureaucracy incapable of innovation.

FAA's NOTAM is how old? What FAA is doing to improve it besides replacing wording of "Air Men" with "Air Missions"? FAA engineers are underpaid and leaving in droves because rigid pay structure does not reflect market realities of engineering vs admin jobs compensation.

The fundamental problem is that the large bureaucracies are not capable of fixing themselves without a major crisis. It is not specific to government agencies as Boeing example shows. However, the market forces will eventually fix Boeng's mess. FAA mess has no end in sight.

Someone is running the government, but it isn't him.

I don't really care - let the future historians sort this out. Although, I firmly believe that "banned" and "progress" are orthogonal concepts. Bans are designed to slow the progress to prevent social disruptions and unrest. Lenna ban is a token to pacify modern day puritans.

Every generation thinks this way. Recall the Prohibition. Subsequent generations viewed Prohibition apologetics like stuck up moral police. The same will happen with current stuck-up moral police on trying to force their views on racial equality and LGBTQ issues. In other words, your kids will think that you were backwards no matter what you do. 100 years from now this IEEE decision will be viewed on the same level as Spanish Inquisition.

The fallacy of Rust fanbois is that they believe if they use Rust then their code is magically "safe". It take much more to write secure and maintainable systems than any programming language can offer.

Teams that lack development discipline will write unsecure and unmaintainable code irrespective of the programming language they use.

It is not that simple. If it was "just their website", you could sue them directly for anything that they publish. However, they are protected from direct liability because they claim that they are just a conduit for people to express their opinions so they are not liable for any published content. They cannot have it both ways.

There were plenty of examples of people getting fired for refusing COVID vaccinations. "coercion" == "achieved by force or threat"