Good point, but... where I'm sitting at, yours, is a foreign country....

Whenever my brother wants to go really fast, he calls it "I'lldrive"

Quoi?

Your post does not reflect your sig, padawan.

Well, seems technically difficult in any case.

But harming even an agressor would be contrary to preserving life. "Patient" is not a legal term just as "victim" is not a medical one.

That may be so, but in legislating open sale of firearms, you are de facto providing easy access to the people likely to misuse them.

The interesting thing with the "self-defence" debate in the US is that the same rights/means which alledgedly give possibility to "self-defend" oneself are THE SAME rights/means given to the potential aggressors to "attack."

To me seems like a lose/lose situation.

Any person can have whatever opinions they want on the right to self-defense.
The Doctor (function, not private person) would violate the hyppocratic oath in prescribing a harming device.

And yes, they are two different things.

You lucky bastard!
When I were young, I were happy if I didn't have ice in the well in the morning, and that were on the hottest day of the year.

Me personally, I use regexp's in ed, sed, Perl &c for batch handling large number of files. I find it handy to keep the same(ish) syntax. But that's just what I do.