You're implying that the voting function changed any outcomes; and that is arguably not true. Further, being so aggressively victim-blaming is a pretty horrid view - and amazingly ironic given your username.

Assuming that a queue doesn't exist, preventing you from making instant connections.

I wasn't ignoring them, but pointing out how they would be protested in the US.

Your right to travel is often suspended before conviction.

Israeli also employs racial profiling. This is something the US can't/won't do (officially). Being PC is costing the US quite a bit, both in terms of effectiveness and monetarily.

A conspiracy with limited platform support.

Correction: The FBI hasn't been able to coax anyone into posing as an Al-Qaeda Assbomber, so they could then swoop in and Save The Day.

The rounds used for hunting are designed to expand (not fragment), and the over-penetration you're describing isn't an issue. Either way, as a bullet fragments it will stop moving forward.

If you can afford x, you can afford x*2 is a pretty obviously false for a huge range of x.

Using...

I'm referring to one of the core tenants of Libertarianism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-aggression_principle -- Your disagreement is somewhat irrelevant.

You're saying that you want to be killed by a torrent of really bad troll posts? That's what I'm getting from this.

Live by the sword implies the use of the tool, not merely the existence of the tool. This man didn't murder anyone, it wouldn't be divine comeuppance for him to die. It would make as much sense (i.e. none at all) to look at a demolition engineer and say, "He worked with explosives, a bomb-maker, it's fitting that it exploded in his face." This man has not "lived by the sword" by any sane definition.

Hi, you either don't understand the premise of non-aggression, or intentionally ignore it. Don't do that. It cheapens your argument.

Nothing like wishing harm on people to show how you're morally superior and non-violent. Amirite?