Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Interesting how little storage is needed (Score 1) 160

Actually, it's not impossible at all. The UK grid needs about 3 times the amount of wind and much more solar and 2 terawatts of underground hydrogen storage.

There's enough salt caverns around the UK that can give it that storage, and the hydrogen can be manufactured via electrolysis when the wind and solar is producing too much. It's not very efficient, but renewables are cheap.

It CAN be done.

Comment Re:Not supported by subsidy (Score 1) 160

FYI as of 2021 the UK had 1.3 GW(h) of battery storage on the grid:

https://www.solarpowerportal.c...

I'm not sure what the total storage is now, it's going to be over 1.5 GW(h) with this installation, and probably a lot more. Note that large batteries aren't needed, it's the total battery storage that's important.

The UK grid operator was particularly keen on getting batteries on it, because the HVDC interconnectors to the continent have been unreliable, and they tend to suddenly break with no warning. That has meant that the grid needs to have a couple of gigawatt of spinning reserve instead, particularly spinning overnight, but with enough batteries they can shut most of that down into hot standby.

The last outage the grid had, due to a lightning strike, they didn't quite have enough battery, and that meant they had to do load shedding and that caused chaos. They should have enough battery now to keep it up long enough if there's a repeat to get backup power running and avoid any load shedding.

The other thing these batteries can do is help smooth out the production curve. If we had enough batteries to smooth out the evening power demand, the CCGT gas turbines would be much more efficient. When they first start up they use about twice as much fuel per kWh until the second cycle kicks in. If they start up less, costs should go down. But we'd need a lot more batteries to make that work.

Comment Re:It's about twice that (Score 2) 282

Over 75% of all victims, regardless of any other correlation (age, fitness, gender, symptom severity), have pericarditis or myocarditis after being infected.

What do you define as "victim"? Certainly not "any person who was infected" I assume. Otherwise it's like to see a reference for that statement.

I didn't do a thorough search but CDC saw that 5000 covid-related myocarditis in the hospitals over the course of a year:
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volum...

Comment Re:Compared to what? (Score 1) 146

I believe that this was caused by overuse of arterial blood gas analysis to determine blood oxygen level. When people have abnormally high white blood cell counts (as is often the case with COVID), if it takes too long to process the samples and you don't adequately cool the blood samples, the WBCs can consume all the oxygen in the blood. The medical term for this is pseudohypoxemia.

Ehm? Blood oxygen is usually not measured by sending blood samples to the lab, but rather with a real-time non-invasive pulse oximeter, as started by the paper that you cite.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...

That said, p.o. indeed tends to give low values under certain conditions, though mainly if the oxygen saturation is critically low anyway (based on a quick look at this paper:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p... )

Slashdot Top Deals

SCCS, the source motel! Programs check in and never check out! -- Ken Thompson

Working...