The AI will undoubtedly get it wrong, leaving room for officers to adjust the report. Of course with a wide range of styles when it comes to making those adjustments.

Why wouldn't someone be allowed to use one license as a template and modify the terms?

As long as there are no contradictions, and conflicts in language are resolved, this is legal. In fact, version THREE of the GPL explicitly allows it. In version two, it's less formal, but still applies. That being said, in this case it probably won't hold up. And, this is speculation, but I would bet that the developer didn't choose language that would guarantee no conflicts.

Wake me up when they are all fined for stifling musicians.

We don't know how certain things work. This wacky theory that accounts for it, so we'll take this as evidence that the wacky theory might be true. ...because nobody can prove that it isn't.
So, it's basically religion all over again, with robots.

I should have put that in quotes.... speaking from the POV of the industry giants.

Or... this technology isn't rocket science. It's all about data and processing power. The barrier to entry is low. So, the barrier for competition is low. We must nip that in the bud.

So you might say that in a sense, the intelligence is "artificial"?

That is fine indeed.

Otherwise this bad behavior is a cost-benefit analysis and it will keep happening.

I indeed meant responsive. Thank you for the clarification.

And allow text to wrap appropriately when the size is increased instead of forcing us to slide the entire page left and right when we zoom in? There's a reason that effort is put in to make pages reactive and Chrome's current behavior undermines that.

I started down the path of specing out a new PC and ran into all of the disincentives you mentioned above. The general PC component marketplace is a cesspool. But, even after sourcing reputable parts, I find the cases themselves lacking. Front bays for blue-ray drives, audio inputs, and USB connectors? Forget it.. it's Disco lights for you, son.

Did the Romans understand that the ingredients had this self-healing effect on the concrete, or did they simply realize that by adding certain compounds, they got better results? They couldn't attest to the longevity because they didn't have the evidence that we have, namely the fact that many structures lasted over two millennia.

Were their technological advances well-understood, but lost to history? Or were their successful techniques purely empirical and simply passed down, but not fully understood?

I don't know... it seemed pretty clear to me... with the whole "IN JAPAN" part. Many things are sensationalized click-bait on slashdot, but this isn't one. I'm sorry you misread the tile.

But in all seriousness, why is this a feature of an application? If I wanted to group running instances together, it should be something the desktop environment supports.