It's not allowed in regular browsers.

What is happening here is that the Web page is opened from within the TikTok app with a Web view screen instead of your actual browser. Since the TikTok app has full control over the Web view, it injects Javascript into every page.

Note, there are legitimate use cases to do exactly that (e.g. Hybrid apps, providing a native Web bridge, etc...).

In Switzerland, we had a vote for Universal Income. Here the following system was used. if you have income, you will not get an additional $1200. You will get nothing. The way it works is that $1200 is taken away from your income and then the same amount is placed back.

This is to make sure that you always have at least $1200 no matter what you do. So if you actually earn already more than $1200, there is no change for you. That means, that you would most likely not get any extra under universal income. Heck, most people will not receive more money

The blog post is really terribly written. It is full of negative emotions which distract from the point the author wants to convey.

The very first screenshot contains a window of "Unetbootin" in Russian and a version of Remix OS USB Tool in English. That makes is very difficult to compare the applications, which is a means to support the authors thesis. Unfortunately, such an article can only have the opposite effect of advertising for Remix OS.

I hope somebody will have a calm look at this and make a write up which is credible. If Remix OS is in violation of the GPL license, I hope that there will be consequences to their actions. At the very least I would expect them to release the source code

This would have been easily circumvented by wiping the current access token key which was used to stay logged in.

If they had done it, everyone would have to sign in again (a minor inconvenience) but the passwords would have been safe

While I believe that there might be some people who had no "morally" dubious intents, I fail to see why anyone with a traditional moral compass would sign up for this website.

Even if you are not married and simply looking for a one nighter, you are still signing up to site where married people are looking for an affair. It is right on their main landing page: "Life is too short, Have an affair". While it sucks for them, I feel it difficult to feel pity for them when signing up to a website which main intend is to make is to make it easy for people to cheat.

The other people could have simply signed up for a different website where the main intent is not cheating. It seems there would be plenty, and none of them are getting hacked

If you were to build linux again, what would be the one most important thing you would do differently

Have you tried using google image search? That might proof to be the easiest solution.

My phone has the same resolution as my TV (both full HD). How would his idea work then? I think he actually does mean screen size. Still no idea how he could implement that...

Smartphones and tables are getting this powerfull that it makes much more sense to have a charging station + screen mirroring for your phone.

Those solutions already exist: http://www.customgadz.com/store/

Wouldnt that make life a lot easier?

They should just remove CTRL + C and CTRL + V as well while they are at it. Not only is it not very discoverable, but it also requires you to use the keyboard. Drag and Drop is so much better and obviously the correct way to do copy paste.

You show a good example. Would you still think that this model is better if:

1) The post man can read your mail without you noticing (e.g. the envelope is never damaged)
2) You have to provide your postman with a key to open your locker? The key might additionally fit into your other lockers (e.g. A lot of people reuse their passwords)
3) The postman can easily store copies of all the letters you receive without you knowing
4) The postman travels from your local post office, to a completely different country, where the correspondence may be inspected by the other government at will without you even knowing and then gives you the letter.

Once you consider these points, you might not like that approach unless you completely trust your postman.

The difference is that these are shared libraries. They live in shared memory and are only loaded once for each application which is using them.

In the web, each library is loaded every time.

Thanks, but no thanks, I prefer to stay with statically types languages. I know that the "kewl" kids love dynamically types languages, but it becomes a horror for maintenance. Ill be sticking with UDK in the meantime

I set gitlab up at home. It is very good, but a maintenance nightmare. No automated installation or updates, so i keep running on an old version.

It would be a 3A solution if they offered a ppa with automatic updates