Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Virtual machines + backup (Score 1) 360

Then shut down the VM.

Unless your backup method is a full backup and keeping only the most recent backup, then of course your archives will likely also contain infected files. Differential backups should enable you to roll back to some point prior to being infected.

Comment Re:Why a Hackintosh? (Score 4, Insightful) 219

For Hackintoshes to become popular, presumably, there is some software on a Mac that isn't available elsewhere. What is driving the Hackintosh need? Personally (note the qualifier), I totally fail to see the need for a Hackintosh - I think all operating systems are fairly advanced and usable now, and it doesn't take long to be proficient in Linux or Windows (or FreeBSD or whatever). Why push a path that isn't supported by Apple? Just use Linux (or Windows) instead - whatever alternate platform your preferred tools work on.

Final Cut is exclusive to Mac OS. A lot of folks who work with audio and visual media will likely find Final Cut useful and perhaps necessary.

But beyond that, because is is much more "closed", has a much more uniform interface. Look at the hodge-podge of different widgets for a Linux desktop system. And on Windows, it's the same -- even the interfaces aren't uniform between different MS products, let alone between different vendors.

My own personal preference is that it has a nice UI and was built on top of *nix. As someone who used to be a die-hard Linux fan, OS X has become a preferred operating system for reasons above.

Comment Theft? (Score 1) 121

There's the question of how the car/truck is going to stop being targeted for theft. I am sure that these cars would be programmed to stop when people are standing in their way -- which would be a perfect way to steal delivery goods. Just have a group of people surround the car/truck at a stop light, and then you pretty much own a bunch of new toys from Amazon. I'll believe it when I see it, I guess.

Comment S&P 500 Companies probably still came out on t (Score 1) 113

Sure they lost a huge chunk of money. But if they had housed their own data, how much would that have cost them up to this point? I wonder if it would have cost more than 150 million. But to address the issue, they should get some redundancy. Mirror across several clouds if need be. It makes me wonder if mirroring would still give them an economic edge vs hosting their own hardware and all the support that requires in additional to the hardware costs.

Comment Re:The security firm provides a competing product (Score 1) 188

They could have been credited with all known vulnerabilities but if they waited 3 months for all the other cases and not this one, then they are still suspect in my eyes. The lawsuit doesn't mean jack until they release the security advisory, so there was no reason not to sit on the 3 months waiting period.

Comment Based on the article, PwC was in the right (Score 1) 188

In an email, a spokesperson for PwC acknowledged the existence of the vulnerability and confirmed that it had been fixed.

The spokesperson also said in separate prepared statement: "The code referenced in this bulletin is not included in the current version of the software which is available to all of our clients."

It seems the article does a poor job of being impartial. Despite the above quotes, they continue with:

It's far from the first time that a security firm or its researchers have faced the wrath from a company that fights instead of fixes.

I am not sure what to make of this since there is still too much information being withheld from both PwC and the article and ESNC.

Comment Re:In before whining about Thiel backing Trump... (Score 1) 165

I actually did read the article. Here's essentially the same comment (without Trump/Thiel referenced): https://slashdot.org/comments.... The fact that the program didn't start like that is just more support for why Thiel is not the reason behind the success. The program didn't become successful until it started recruiting already-successful candidates. So in effect, the program is successful because it basically "bought" its success through its selection process. For the record: I don't like neither Trump (compulsive liar who likes to inflate the truth and take credit for things he had little to nothing to do with) nor Hillary (also a liar and complete fraud).

Slashdot Top Deals

Chemist who falls in acid is absorbed in work.

Working...