Comment Re:50 years of dark matter mathematics (Score 1) 35
Two comments:
1) Your preferred candidate model is at odds with the _data_. Observational data is what you have to test a model against, and your preferred model fails spectacularly: it can't explain the baryon acoustic oscillation spectrum, or the large scale intergalactic structure, or the polarization spectrum of the microwave background, or the accelerating cosmic expansion rate. That's _why_ the current concordance model became accepted as most probable: it explains the data
2) People like to rag on the aether model, and it's true that we no longer believe there is an aether, but that's because the _data_ don't require it. However, it was _not_ a crazy expectation. All wave phenomena known to the time required a physical medium to propagate in; light was a wave; ergo, the hypothesis of the aether as the medium to support light propagation. The aether fell out of favor because every attempt to measure its properties failed, and physics eventually relegated it to an interesting historical footnote.