In all likelihood this is not the same, or not comparable. Supposedly the water flowing through municipal & home plumbing over time develops a layer of "film" as some layer of protection. This came out in the Flint Michigan lead water crisis story. They had a kind of water (corrosive?) that needed an additive and removed the additive for cost savings and then the water ate through the film and into the lead pipes.
Anyway my reason to comment today is to shun all the FUD throwers trying to urge us to ignore the problem and ignore these journalists. I suspect they're industry shills, or are doing so for free because they're straight up idiots. We ignore all of this at our own peril. Sperm counts are down. Why? Cancer rates among the young are rising, and its not just Covid or the shot, this was happing in the years before 2020 also. We've got glyphosate/roundup in our corn food products and no one wants to be concerned about it. Certainly not the revolving door of industry and lobbyists at the FDA or the Ag department. We should be concerned, and listen to Mexico's anger on this in particular - though I suspect we eat more corn in the USA than we realize. Journalists have to raise alarm where its due, and we should think critically about these matters and weight them with an open mind. All of these things will unfold over time and just like tobacco will take decades to face the music.
Cheney, is that you? Shouldn't you be out pheasant hunting? It is the last day of the season, stay safe.
Snark aside, I detest this "we must police the world" mindset. Why was it our job to address terrorism and despot states in the middle east? We know that doesn't always go well; I won't list all those examples. Some other regional state should have and could have stepped up and dealt with their own home-grown terrorist problems for us. It is much more their concern than ours and it should be their desire to do so. There's no guarantee bin laden survives in our absence. Regardless, who punished the Saudis? Who punished Pakistan? There's holes all over in the logic from that era and I will forever despise the neocon war hawks who espouse it. They did not tell us their real reasons for what they did. Never forget the broken backs, ears, and minds a plenty we got back in return for the boys who came home.
On the one hand, chalk it all up to greed. But on the other, I'm sure its all about the potential upside. If your investments are sufficiently diversified you could put a small portion of it into crypto and then wait to see if it was eventually worth the risk. "About 1% of companies accounted for all of the global net wealth creation. - The other 99% of companies were a distraction to the task of making money."
If BTC goes from 30k to 300k, your small risky investment of say 10% of your portfolio could grow to be close 50% (1btc owned of an initial $300k overall mix) and reward your gamble. If you risked only 1% you'd still grow at 10%. This is all hypothetical, just trying to think of a way it could be viewed as something better than stupid.
For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!