Teen boys watching all of it. Jaded. Nothing surprising. Nothing new. Nothing they haven't already done, vicariously, too many times.
Lots of memories. Lots of experience, in theory. And then in practice, they can't get it up.
Look it up. They complain about it online.
When 900 children you make as I am good you will not look, hm?
Star Trek was a sci-fi product of the 60s just like The Twilight Zone (give or take a few years). What made them great was 1) episodes were independent and 2) the writers were actual experienced sci-fi short story writers.
When you mess with 1) and 2) you lose the magic.Screen writers are not good at original storylines and series arcs are effectively putting all eggs in a single storyline basket. Either the audience likes it or they don't and the show dies.
Whereas when you have 1) you can afford to experiment with independent ideas, and there's more chance that everyone likes at least one episode. Also 2) raises the bar of quality.
2) if unions still have to fight in this day and age for something basic like "just cause" terminations, then wtf have they been doing all this time? Maybe they need to step up the cadence rather than AI,AI,AI.
(Now you know who to blame.)
You might lose money because you overestimate the value of that thing but the amount of money you can lose is limited somewhat because there is still a tangible asset backing your purchase.
Nope. That's not true for several types of futures strategies, and it is not a good way to classify gambling vs investment.
Optimization hinders evolution.