Use AI Reviews

Summary: Used Use AI to plan and write a pitch. All the pieces remained together in one space, making it a breeze to collaborate.

Positive: Having the ability to brainstorm, write, and summarize in one application saved me app-switching time.

Negative: A calendar integration would make it even more useful for project planning.

Summary: Processed my writing tasks here for a week. Productivity was indeed enhanced and the learning curve wasn't drastic.

Positive: Interface is easy enough for beginners but deep enough for complex workflows, striking a great balance between simplicity and control.

Negative: Could include drag-and-drop chat organization for power users.

Summary: I employed this during the comparison of gpt-4 and deepseek results. It made it easy later to analyze results.

Positive: The threads kept my model tests tidy and made it easy to come back to previous experiments. It is extremely easy comparing gpt-4 and deepseek results.

Negative: Would be great to have color-coded threads for easy visual scanning.

Summary: This feature saved me a lot of time one time while working on a large research project. It left all my details intact even as I switched models.

Positive: Carrying chat context upon model switching is a way that I don't need to repeatedly rewrite prompts.

Negative: May allow users to edit context slightly prior to passing it along to the next model.

Summary: I conserved time during a brainstorming session by not having to start again when I wanted a second perspective from another model.

Positive: Switching back and forth between OpenAI and Anthropic models during the middle of a discussion was seamless and immediate.

Negative: Perhaps display estimated token price before switching to a more costly model.

Summary: I used this for an all-day workshop. The transcription was good, and it was easy to edit the notes afterwards.

Positive: The voice - controlled note taking enabled me to concentrate on the conversation rather than typing.

Negative: It would appreciate a timestamp feature so that notes can be associated with significant events.

Summary: On heavy workload days, having model status known beforehand before running an important task avoided waiting needlessly.

Positive: Appreciated knowing which models were available and which were quicker or more affordable prior to choosing.

Negative: Would include a quick refresh button to refresh availability without page reload.

Summary: I utilized the visual output assistance to create early mockups on a campaign. It reduced back-and-forth with designers.

Positive: Prompted image creation performed better than I had hoped and provided me with sharp outputs for a concept pitch.

Negative: Only wish there were a gallery view for previous images so you can quickly look at results.

Summary: I provided it with writing, summarizing, and translating tasks. The recommendations seemed intelligent, and performance matched what I needed almost always.

Positive: The task-based automatic model selection was remarkably on point and prevented me from having to select manually each time.

Negative: Perhaps it would be good for learning if a reason for why one model was recommended was explained.

Summary: Used the entire day with "Use AI" to take meeting notes and to look up things quickly. The workspace never became cluttered, keeping me focused.

Positive: I like it that each one of the items is nicely organized – history, model dropdown, and tools all in one spot.

Negative: It would be nice to have a power user-only keyboard shortcut list.

Summary: I wrote the announcement in English, received crisp translations in three regions, and it read smoothly with no rewriting required to save my team hours.

Positive: The support of over 30+ languages truly excels at writing to a world-wide audience. Very convenient and useful.

Negative: The program could also store the most frequent language combinations to allow fast switching.

Summary: I used the tool to debug a difficult function. Comparing the solutions from gpt-4 and claude allowed me to choose between two good options.

Positive: The gpt-4o model pointed me in the direction of a bug and provided a first-attempt solution that fixed it.

Negative: Would be nice to include a code formatting switch to make longer outputs readable.

Summary: I used Use AI for product naming sessions. Seeing multiple outputs side by side was fun and actually helped pick the final name.

Positive: Having three models generate ideas in parallel sparked creativity and gave me diverse angles to consider.

Negative: I’d like a way to collapse or group responses when there are too many on screen.

Summary: I executed logical proofs and code verification. The quality of the reasoning was great and spared me from later debugging.

Positive: Having access to heavy reasoning models such as claude opus and deepseek r1 was beneficial for complicated logic work.

Negative: Some of the advanced models take slightly longer to load in – a progress bar would be comforting.

Summary: All of my weekly content planning was managed in Use AI. Everything stayed tidy, and I did not need to copy-paste between tools.

Positive: All interactions between models remain neatly grouped together, with no tabbing between tabs and programs required for task management.

Negative: Consider adding a quick search bar for older conversations for a quick way to find older results.