Best Cyber Risk Management Software for GitHub

Find and compare the best Cyber Risk Management software for GitHub in 2024

Use the comparison tool below to compare the top Cyber Risk Management software for GitHub on the market. You can filter results by user reviews, pricing, features, platform, region, support options, integrations, and more.

  • 1
    Axonius Reviews
    Axonius gives IT and security teams the confidence to control complexity by providing a system of record for all digital infrastructure. With a comprehensive understanding of all assets including devices, identities, software, SaaS applications, vulnerabilities, security controls, and the context between them, customers are able to mitigate threats, navigate risk, decrease incident response time, automate action, and inform business-level strategy — all while eliminating manual, repetitive tasks.
  • 2
    Polymer Reviews

    Polymer

    Polymer Solutions

    $4/month/user
    Polymer DLP secures your SaaS apps by preventing sensitive information like business-critical data or PII from being sent to the wrong people. We used machine learning and natural language processing to automatically detect and remediate files and messages in real time. In addition we provide training at the time of infraction, which is proven to help prevent future incidents before they happen. Try for free and set up your custom policy in minutes. Polymer is constantly expanding, currently we integrate with Slack, Google Drive, Microsoft Teams, One Drive, Bitbucket, Github and Box.
  • 3
    IriusRisk Reviews
    IriusRisk is an open Threat Modeling platform that can be used by any development and operations team – even those without prior security training. Whether your organization follows a framework or not, we can work with all the threat modeling methodologies, such as STRIDE, TRIKE, OCTAVE and PASTA. We support organisations in financial services, insurance, industrial automation, healthcare, private sector and more. IriusRisk is the industry's leading threat modeling and secure design solution in Application Security. With enterprise clients including Fortune 500 banks, payments, and technology providers, it empowers security and development teams to ensure applications have security built-in from the start - using its powerful threat modeling platform. Whether teams are implementing threat modeling from scratch, or scaling-up their existing operations, the IriusRisk approach results in improved speed-to-market, collaboration across security and development teams, and the avoidance of costly security flaws.
  • 4
    SD Elements Reviews
    Today, Security Compass is a pioneer in application security that enables organizations to shift left and build secure applications by design, integrated directly with existing DevSecOps tools and workflows. To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with an investment in SD Elements, Security Compass commissioned Forrester Consulting to interview four decision-makers with direct experience using the platform. Forrester aggregated the interviewees’ experiences for this study and combined the results into a single composite organization. The decision-maker interviews and financial analysis found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $2.86 million over three years versus costs of $663,000, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $2.20 million and an ROI of 332%. Security Compass is the trusted solution provider to leading financial and technology organizations, the US Department of Defense, government agencies, and renowned global brands across multiple industries.
  • 5
    Phylum Reviews
    Phylum defends applications at the perimeter of the open-source ecosystem and the tools used to build software. Its automated analysis engine scans third-party code as soon as it’s published into the open-source ecosystem to vet software packages, identify risks, inform users and block attacks. Think of Phylum like a firewall for open-source code. Phylum can be deployed in front of artifact repository managers, integrate directly with package managers or be deployed in CI/CD pipelines. Phylum users benefit from its powerful, automated analysis engine that reports proprietary findings instead of relying on manually curated lists. Phylum uses SAST, heuristics, machine learning and artificial intelligence to detect and report zero-day findings. Users know more risks, sooner and earlier in the development lifecycle for the strongest software supply chain defense. The Phylum policy library allows users to toggle on the blocking of critical vulnerabilities, attacks like typosquats, obfuscated code and dependency confusion, copyleft licenses, and more. Additionally, the flexibility of OPA enables customers to develop incredibly flexible and granular policies that fit their unique needs.
  • 6
    Cypago Reviews
    Automated workflows with no-code reduce manual effort, lower costs and increase trust with customers. Using automated and simplified cross-functional processes, you can improve your security governance, risks, and compliance (GRC). You will learn everything you need to achieve and maintain compliance across all IT environments and security frameworks. Get a detailed, ongoing view of your compliance and risk. Automated processes can save thousands of hours in manual work. Put security policies and procedure into action to maintain accountability. Finally, a complete audit experience that includes audit scope generation, customization, 3600 evidence gathering across data silos and in-context gap analyses, as well as auditor-trusted reporting. Audits can be much easier and more efficient than what they are now. Enjoy instant insights into your employee and user base's access privileges and rights.
  • 7
    Seemplicity Reviews
    Automated workflows have revolutionized workplace productivity. But what about security? Security teams are often forced to play the role of air traffic controller when it comes to driving down risk. They must deduplicate, sort and prioritize every security finding that is received, then route and follow up with developers across the organization to ensure that problems get resolved. This results in a huge administrative burden on already resource-constrained teams, stubbornly long times-to-remediation, friction among security and development, and inability to scale. Seemplicity simplifies the work of security teams by automating, optimizing and scaling all risk reduction workflows from one place. Aggregated findings that use the same solution for the same resource. Exceptions such as tickets rejected or tickets with a fixed status and an open finding are automatically redirected at the security team for review.
  • 8
    Scrut Automation Reviews
    Scrut allows you to automate risk assessment and monitoring. You can also create your own unique infosec program that puts your customers' needs first. Scrut lets you manage multiple compliance audits and demonstrate trust in your customers from a single interface. Scrut allows you to discover cyber assets, create your infosec program, monitor your controls 24/7 for compliance, and manage multiple audits at the same time. Monitor risks in your infrastructure and applications landscape in real-time, and stay compliant using 20+ compliance frameworks. Automated workflows and seamless sharing of artifacts allow you to collaborate with team members, auditors and pen-testers. Create, assign and monitor tasks for daily compliance management with automated alerts. Make continuous security compliance easy with the help of more than 70 integrations. Scrut's dashboards are intuitive and provide quick overviews.
  • 9
    Silk Security Reviews
    All in one platform, you can cut through the findings, automate risk prioritization and collaborate on fixing remediation. Cloud, hybrid, and cloud native applications create more complexity and scale issues than legacy approaches can begin to address. Security teams are unable to prioritize and measure risk when they lack enough context. Security teams are faced with a challenge when they receive duplicate alerts from different tools. They must prioritize and assign remediation ownership. 60% of breaches are caused by a security alert the organization was aware of, but had difficulty identifying the stakeholder responsible for the fix. Map stakeholder responsibilities, enable self-service remediation and actionable recommendations and facilitate bidirectional collaborative through integration with existing tools and workflows.
  • Previous
  • You're on page 1
  • Next