Compare Testsigma vs. UI-licious

Testsigma is a low-code end-to-end test automation platform for Agile teams. It lets SDETs, manual testers, SMEs, and QAs collaboratively plan, develop, execute, analyze, debug, and report on their automated testing for websites, native Android and iOS apps, and APIs. It is available as a fully managed, cloud-based solution as well as a self-hosted instance that is open source (Testsigma Community Edition). The platform is built with Java, but the automated tests are code-agnostic. Through built-in NLP Grammar, teams can automate user actions in simple English, or generate airtight test scripts with the Test Recorder. With features like built-in visual testing, parametrized or data-driven testing, 2FA testing, and an AI that automatically fixes unstable elements and test steps, identifies and isolates regression-affected scripts, and provides suggestions to help you find and fix test failures, Testsigma can replace tens of different tools in the QA toolchain to enable teams to test easily, continuously, and collaboratively.

Stop writing brittle test with hard-coded CSS, waits, and XPATH selectors. Make your tests meaningful, easy to maintain, and reusable. This is because writing tests with hard-coded CSS or XPATH selectors is similar to pouring concrete on a specific UI implementation. This creates high-maintenance tests which break at the most minor changes to the UI and is difficult for humans to understand. UI-licious uses dynamic codes analysis to analyze the structure of your website. This is done using ARIA accessibility attributes and semantic HTML. It also examines the context of previous commands to determine which element should be targeted for each command. This means that even if HTML code for the UI is changed underneath the code, the test will still be valid as long the user's journey remains the same. Your website does not have to be perfect for UI-licious work.