Compare Liminal vs. SecurePledge

Liminal gives regulated organizations a single governed environment for AI. Rather than securing models an organization has already deployed, Liminal supplies the access itself, so protection is applied before anything reaches a provider. Employees work with leading models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google and others through one interface, with policy-based routing and no per-provider contracts. Adding a new model becomes a policy decision rather than an integration project, and teams are never stuck waiting for procurement to catch up with what the market released. Sensitive terms are identified within each prompt and masked, redacted, flagged or blocked according to rules defined by data category rather than by department. Masked values are restored in the response, which keeps output usable while regulated information stays inside the organization. Employees never have to sanitize inputs by hand, which is what makes the governed path the one they actually choose. Administrators see who used which model, what rules were applied and where violations occurred. That record is generated at the time of the interaction, so audit requests are answered from existing evidence instead of reconstruction after the fact. Activity can be fed into existing security tooling and reviewed alongside other events rather than in isolation. The platform connects to internal systems through MCP, so employees bring organizational context into their work without moving data into tools nobody is watching. Access follows permissions that already exist. Deployments run on single-tenant infrastructure with SSO and role-based permissions, serving banking and credit unions, insurance, healthcare, education, state and local government, and life sciences.

SecurePledge serves as an AI interaction security platform tailored for organizations that require stringent controls over the sensitive information exchanged with generative AI technologies. It actively monitors AI usage, pinpointing and evaluating content that may be sensitive, with the ability to redact such information prior to its exposure to AI services. Key features encompass browser-based controls for AI usage, the detection of unauthorized AI tools, enforcement of policies, monitoring of user activities, and maintaining comprehensive audit trails. The platform includes various components designed for AI data safeguarding, document redaction, protection across both browser and desktop environments, and governance protocols. Specifically aimed at security and technology teams operating in data-sensitive sectors such as healthcare, legal, financial services, and enterprise technology, it empowers organizations to implement data protection and usage policies across supported AI workflows while ensuring visibility into critical activities. The extent of coverage provided will vary based on the specific deployment and configuration settings employed by the organization. Ultimately, SecurePledge enhances the overall security posture by integrating robust monitoring and control features that mitigate the risks associated with sensitive data interactions in AI environments.