Compare CodeSign vs. StepSecurity

Code signing serves as a reliable security measure that safeguards the trustworthiness of software systems and applications. Entities that both develop and utilize software require a robust code signing solution to verify the authenticity of their software products. The primary goal is to ensure that genuine software is not hijacked for malicious purposes, such as ransomware attacks. CodeSign by Aujas offers a scalable and secure platform that seamlessly integrates with DevOps, guaranteeing the integrity of software applications while enabling allow-listing to defend internal infrastructure. It also secures the signing keys, provides automated audit trails, and actively fights against ransomware threats. Available as both a SaaS solution and an on-premise appliance, CodeSign can efficiently scale to accommodate hundreds of millions of file signings annually. Its remarkable flexibility allows it to sign all file types across various platforms, making it an invaluable resource for organizations that rely on a diverse range of software applications to support their daily operations. By implementing such a solution, businesses can bolster their defenses against emerging cyber threats.

For those utilizing GitHub Actions in their CI/CD processes and concerned about the security of their pipelines, the StepSecurity platform offers a robust solution. It allows for the implementation of network egress controls and enhances the security of CI/CD infrastructures specifically for GitHub Actions runners. By identifying potential CI/CD risks and detecting misconfigurations in GitHub Actions, users can safeguard their workflows. Additionally, the platform enables the standardization of CI/CD pipeline as code files through automated pull requests, streamlining the process. StepSecurity also provides runtime security measures to mitigate threats such as the SolarWinds and Codecov attacks by effectively blocking egress traffic using an allowlist approach. Users receive immediate, contextual insights into network and file events for all workflow executions, enabling better monitoring and response. The capability to control network egress traffic is refined through granular job-level and default cluster-wide policies, enhancing overall security. It is important to note that many GitHub Actions may lack proper maintenance, posing significant risks. While enterprises often opt to fork these Actions, the ongoing upkeep can be costly. By delegating the responsibilities of reviewing, forking, and maintaining these Actions to StepSecurity, businesses can achieve considerable reductions in risk while also saving valuable time and resources. This partnership not only enhances security but also allows teams to focus on innovation rather than on managing outdated tools.