Compare Azure Load Balancer vs. FortiADC

Efficiently distribute both internet and private network traffic to achieve optimal performance with minimal latency. Instantly enhance the scalability of your applications while ensuring consistent high availability. The Load Balancer operates seamlessly across virtual machines, virtual machine scale sets, and various IP addresses. It is specifically designed to manage network layer traffic, catering to situations where exceptional performance and ultra-low latency are essential. The Standard Load Balancer directs traffic not only within regions but also across them, including availability zones, ensuring robust resiliency. You can develop highly available and scalable applications in just minutes thanks to the integrated application load balancing feature for cloud services and virtual machines. Furthermore, the Load Balancer supports a variety of protocols, including TCP/UDP-based ones like HTTP, HTTPS, and SMTP, as well as those utilized in real-time voice and video communication applications. It also allows for effective traffic management between virtual machines within your private virtual networks or can be leveraged to build complex multi-tier hybrid applications, providing flexibility and control over your network architecture.

FortiGSLB efficiently and securely provides applications across various locations. A crucial aspect of designing and implementing internet-driven services for both enterprise and carrier networks is horizontal scalability. Organizations need the capability to swiftly and conveniently incorporate additional network resources and launch cloud-based applications to maintain business continuity and facilitate effective disaster recovery in case of server or data center failures. However, unreliable internet connectivity or security can hinder these initiatives significantly. Lacking such adaptability often compels businesses to invest in larger and more powerful hardware solutions to tackle capacity issues, resulting in higher expenses and an increase in total cost of ownership (TCO) without effectively solving problems related to failover and service availability. Ultimately, finding a balance between performance and cost efficiency remains critical for organizations striving to meet growing demands.