Use the comparison tool below to compare the top Code Coverage tools on the market. You can filter results by user reviews, pricing, features, platform, region, support options, integrations, and more.
Talk to one of our software experts for free. They will help you select the best software for your business.
SmartBear
$719 one-time paymentOpenCppCoverage
FreeSonarSource
€10 per monthDeepSource
$12 per user per monthfroglogic
€124.17 per monthmetacpan
FreeCode coverage tools areprograms that measure the amount of code in a given program that is actually executed when you run it. It measures how much of your code is tested, or has been exercised at least once during its lifetime. Code coverage tools allow developers and testers to quickly identify areas of un-tested code which can help inform development decisions about what tests need to be written, as well as where optimization opportunities exist.
Using code coverage tools helps ensure quality and robustness of the applications being created by identifying gaps in test cases. These gaps can be addressed with additional unit tests, integration tests, or manual testing methods. By discovering untested lines of code early on, bugs and other issues can be prevented from reaching production environments. This emphasis on maintaining a high level of quality also boosts customer confidence in the application that they are using and encourages ongoing product improvement.
When running a code coverage report, most tools will generate a detailed report showing which lines in the source code have been covered (or tested) and which ones have not been touched by any test case yet. The report may also provide an indication of what percentage of total lines were actually tested against the total number available for testing; this is referred to as Coverage Percentage or Test Coverage Rate.
Most modern IDE’s (Integrated Development Environments) offer some form of built-in support for code coverage analysis allowing for execution times to be monitored efficiently within the development environment itself rather than having to resort to external scripts each time changes are made to the software under review or test cases need verification. Examples include Xcode's Instruments tool from Apple Inc., Visual Studio's Code Coverage Tool from Microsoft Corporation and Apache Ant's Cobertura Software Project among others; all providing easy-to-use GUI interfaces tailored largely to their respective user base needs while still offering more advanced capabilities like customizing filters and output reports based on specific user preferences.
Code coverage tools are an essential part of software development. They alert developers to areas of code that are not adequately tested, allowing them to focus their efforts on optimizing their application’s functionality. By providing clear reports and analysis, these tools streamline the coding process and increase efficiency.
Using code coverage tools helps developers identify which lines of code were executed during testing and what lines were skipped or not activated at all. This is especially useful for debugging, as it gives developers a better picture of how specific sections of code have been handled by the system—what did work? What didn't? With this information in hand, developers can fine-tune their code to ensure the best possible results from testing.
Another way that code coverage tools come in handy is through automated integration with bug tracking systems. When bugs arise during testing, the tool can quickly pinpoint exactly where they occurred in the source code, so that appropriate measures can be taken immediately. This ensures faster resolution time for any issues encountered during testing and streamlined corrective action for future releases.
Finally, some modern code coverage products offer additional features such as unit tests guidance and support for multiple languages and frameworks. Such features help developers stay on top of newly emerging technologies while simultaneously ensuring uniform performance across different operating systems and web servers—saving valuable development time in the long run.
All in all, using a quality coverage tool means enhanced productivity throughout your software development project cycle—from debugging to test runs to bug fixing—and improved overall application performance over time.
The cost of code coverage tools can vary depending on the specific tool being used and the features you need. Generally, there are a range of options available, ranging from free to enterprise-level pricing.
For basic code coverage needs, open-source tools such as Cobertura or gcov are available for free. These tools run analyses on your codebase and output results that may still require manual interpretation in order to draw insights about program quality. They also generally lack dynamic traceability of code changes and other advanced metrics but are sufficient for basic analysis purposes.
At the higher end of the spectrum, commercial products such as Parasoft’s Jtest or Veracode offer more comprehensive analysis capabilities from both a static and a dynamic perspective. These packages generally provide enhanced reporting capabilities with detailed dashboards that allow users to monitor various aspects of their applications in real time. The advance analytics often come at a price though – high-end solutions can range between $20K up to several hundred thousand dollars per license depending on features needed and size of the deployment team.
Software that is written in a programming language can integrate with code coverage tools. This includes application software, system software, and libraries. These types of software are able to provide metrics on the number of lines and functions that have been executed. The data gathered by code coverage tools can then be used as feedback to improve the quality and maintainability of the codebase. In addition, many Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) offer plugins for code coverage tools which make it easier for developers to monitor their projects during the development and testing phases.