Best Software Testing Tools for Safari

Find and compare the best Software Testing tools for Safari in 2025

Use the comparison tool below to compare the top Software Testing tools for Safari on the market. You can filter results by user reviews, pricing, features, platform, region, support options, integrations, and more.

  • 1
    UI-licious Reviews

    UI-licious

    Uilicious

    $90 per month
    Stop writing brittle test with hard-coded CSS, waits, and XPATH selectors. Make your tests meaningful, easy to maintain, and reusable. This is because writing tests with hard-coded CSS or XPATH selectors is similar to pouring concrete on a specific UI implementation. This creates high-maintenance tests which break at the most minor changes to the UI and is difficult for humans to understand. UI-licious uses dynamic codes analysis to analyze the structure of your website. This is done using ARIA accessibility attributes and semantic HTML. It also examines the context of previous commands to determine which element should be targeted for each command. This means that even if HTML code for the UI is changed underneath the code, the test will still be valid as long the user's journey remains the same. Your website does not have to be perfect for UI-licious work.
  • 2
    Karma Reviews

    Karma

    Karma

    Free
    Karma primarily aims to create an efficient testing environment for developers. This environment is designed to minimize the need for extensive configurations, allowing developers to focus on coding while receiving immediate feedback from their tests. Quick feedback is essential for enhancing both productivity and creativity. Users can test their code across various real browsers and devices, including smartphones, tablets, and even a headless PhantomJS instance. The entire workflow can be managed via the command line or directly from the IDE; simply saving a file will prompt Karma to execute all relevant tests. Additionally, Karma actively monitors all files listed in the configuration, and any modification to these files will trigger a test rerun as it notifies the testing server to instruct all connected browsers to execute the test code anew. Each browser loads the source files in an IFrame, runs the tests, and sends the results back to the server, ensuring developers are always informed of their code's performance. This seamless integration fosters a more streamlined development process and helps maintain code quality over time.
  • 3
    Playwright Reviews

    Playwright

    Playwright

    Free
    Playwright is compatible with all contemporary rendering engines, such as Chromium, WebKit, and Firefox. It enables testing across various operating systems like Windows, Linux, and macOS, whether locally or in continuous integration environments, and can operate in both headless and headed modes. The framework ensures that actions are only performed once elements are ready for interaction, and it includes a comprehensive set of introspection events. This synergy effectively removes the reliance on artificial timeouts, which are a common source of unreliable tests. Additionally, Playwright's assertions are tailored for the dynamic nature of the web, automatically reattempting checks until the specified criteria are fulfilled. Users can customize their test retry strategies and capture execution traces, videos, and screenshots to further mitigate instability. In terms of architecture, browsers execute web content from different origins in separate processes, allowing Playwright to align with modern browser frameworks and conduct tests out-of-process. This design choice helps to avoid the usual constraints associated with in-process test runners, ultimately enhancing testing efficiency and reliability. As a result, Playwright emerges as a robust solution for developers seeking to streamline their testing processes.
  • 4
    OpenText Functional Test Automation Reviews
    Functional test automation for web and mobile applications. Rich-client, enterprise, and rich-client applications. Collaborative testing design allows business and technical stakeholders work together to ensure that all aspects of the test coverage are covered. You can ensure quality and speed up testing on all devices and platforms, including web, mobile, rich client, enterprise, and rich-client. Utilize existing Selenium scripts to record additional steps in Silk Test desktop and mobile browsers. To provide quick feedback on daily check ins, integrate functional testing into the CI/CD pipeline. Parallel and dockerized testing are both possible. Create a single script that can be used to test against IE and Edge, Firefox, Chrome and Safari. With embedded back-end virtualization, you can create realistic simulations of service behavior and save time. Collaboration in test design allows business and technical stakeholders work together to ensure coverage for all customer usage patterns.
  • Previous
  • You're on page 1
  • Next