Journalist AI Reviews

Summary: Avoid it at all costs. These guys are absolute scammers, will ruin your SEO and online reputation. I am contemplating legal action to run these scammers into the ground.

Positive: Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Avoid it at all costs. Absolute scammers, will ruin your SEO and online reputation

Negative: Fuck no. It is piece of shit tool. It flooded my blog with hundreds of duplicate posts, and thanks to their social integration, my LinkedIn as well. Result: My blog SEO was negatively impacted and linked basically started marking my content as low quality spam. I am getting <10 views on LinkedIn with 25k+ subscribers, down from 200-300 views that i was getting earlier. Avoid this fucking shit like a plague. I am contemplating legal action to run these scammers into the ground.

Summary: Very bad, really hurt my site's SEO efforts.
You can't use this tool as is!!!
You have to re-write afterwards.

Positive: Easy to use.

Negative: I don't know how it is in English but in other languages it's very very bad.
Repetitive, doesn't matter what i write the tool writes the same bad content.

Summary: Would've been a decent tool for generating a lot of content for a new website, but can't get past costing our client so much money for something that should've been discovered during development rather than after accepting payment from users.

Positive: Easily create a lot of blog posts and autoposting on Wordpress website. Easy to use and integrate with website. Pricing is good.

Negative: Got one of our clients into legal trouble by scraping copyright images from Google and inserting them into articles. Cost several thousand dollars to mitigate and took no responsibility for it. They changed their app based on the feedback but that did our client no favors.

Summary: As my first product review on here, I feel compelled to share my experience with this software – it's that bad. Like others have pointed out, this service is riddled with issues. The tool, which was marketed as a high-quality solution, consistently failed to function as advertised. Despite numerous promises for fixes, the service remained fraught with problems, leading me to question its reliability and the integrity of the company.

Positive: The advertised features suggested a level of sophistication and efficiency unheard of. However, they simply don't work.

Negative: I encountered an array of technical glitches that rendered the tool nearly unusable. From errors in posting to integration to irrelevant videos being chosen by the AI, the list of issues was endless. The software frequently produced articles with seemingly random bold text and nonsensical links, such as linking to an article about arms when discussing legs. Even the sales pitches were out of context, and the articles were filled with generic terms, lacking any meaningful content. Finally, the brand "pro" feature is completely broken, listing us as a supplement company while we're a workout app.

The final straw was the response (or lack thereof) to my request for a refund. Despite acknowledging the multitude of issues, the company refused to issue a refund, even on an annual plan. It's unreasonable to expect customers to pay for 12 months of service when the product fails in the first month. This refusal not only reflects poorly on their customer service but also speaks volumes about their business ethics.

A cursory search online reveals a growing number of negative reviews, with phrases like "Overpromising tool, bad support" becoming a common sentiment. It's disheartening to see a company not only fail to deliver on its promises but also refuse to take responsibility for its shortcomings.

In conclusion, this software has been a disappointment on multiple fronts – from its faulty functionality to the company's lack of accountability. I strongly advise potential users to steer clear and consider alternative solutions. The market is full of promising tools, and it's not worth risking time and resources on a product that has consistently proven to be unreliable.

Summary: Among the worst support I've received in the past 10 years. Had bought a subscription to generate articles with internal links, but those links were completely useless. After asking if we could get a refund, as we won't be able to do what we bought the tool for, they denied. Finally, our credits were deleted on the last day of our subscription, while we were in the middle of using to the tool to at least get some value out of it in the form of some articles (without internal links). The day was not over and effectively they deleted our credits while we were still in our billing cycle. Again reached out to the developers and did not get the credits back but was offered a discount on a new purchase. Not the way to conduct business in a dignified way, nor should client be treated like that. No recommendation for the tool.

Positive: Ease of use and the articles seemed to be okay enough in terms of quality and structure, but often visible that it is an AI article.

Negative: Bad support that is inexperienced or just does not fully seem to care about the client experiences.

Summary: It's a great content generator tool, and on top of that, it automated about 90% of my workflow. I couldn't be happier with it honestly. The fact that I can test multiple outputs, change between images, and play around with the tone of voice and creativity makes it superior to any other tool out there.

I own a Shopify store and the fact that I can just plug this in with it and it generates content for my products is crazy. I love it.

Positive: The best thing about it is the speed at which you can test and generate content. It's crazy fast.

Also setting it up with my Shopify store to create content based on my products, using my images and videos, and on top of that having a CTA to my products is amazing. It essentially cuts down my workflow by about 90%. Great stuff guys.

Negative: The design could be improved, but that's just me being picky.