GPT-4o Description
GPT-4o, with the "o" denoting "omni," represents a significant advancement in the realm of human-computer interaction by accommodating various input types such as text, audio, images, and video, while also producing outputs across these same formats. Its capability to process audio inputs allows for responses in as little as 232 milliseconds, averaging 320 milliseconds, which closely resembles the response times seen in human conversations. In terms of performance, it maintains the efficiency of GPT-4 Turbo for English text and coding while showing marked enhancements in handling text in other languages, all while operating at a much faster pace and at a cost that is 50% lower via the API. Furthermore, GPT-4o excels in its ability to comprehend vision and audio, surpassing the capabilities of its predecessors, making it a powerful tool for multi-modal interactions. This innovative model not only streamlines communication but also broadens the possibilities for applications in diverse fields.
Pricing
Company Details
Product Details
GPT-4o Features and Options
Artificial Intelligence Software
Natural Language Processing Software
Natural Language Generation Software
GPT-4o Lists
GPT-4o User Reviews
Write a Review-
Likelihood to Recommend to Others1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Really powerful and really fast and cheap Date: Jan 28 2025
Summary: GPT-4o is a huge leap forward in AI capabilities. Its multimodal processing, speed, and affordability make it a fantastic tool for developers, researchers, and anyone looking to level up their productivity. While there’s a bit of a learning curve, the results are absolutely worth it. I’d recommend it to anyone serious about using cutting-edge AI.
Positive: GPT-4o is a powerhouse. Its ability to handle text, images, and audio seamlessly has been huge for my work. It’s incredibly fast and feels natural to interact with, like having a smart assistant that truly understands what you need. The multilingual capabilities are impressive, and it’s noticeably better than previous models at non-English tasks. Plus, the API is much more cost-effective, being 50% cheaper than earlier versions, which is a huge win.
Negative: No cons thus far.
Read More...
- Previous
- You're on page 1
- Next