Fork Description
Fork continues to improve with each passing day, and we are excited to present our latest achievements to you. It discreetly notifies you about GitHub updates without being intrusive. You can easily tackle merge conflicts with the help of our dedicated merge-conflict assistant and integrated resolver. Additionally, you can edit, reorder, and squash your commits seamlessly through a visual interactive rebase feature. Fork enables you to view diffs for various common image formats, enhancing your workflow. The Diff Viewer in Fork offers a straightforward perspective to quickly identify changes in your source code. With the history view, you can track all commits related to specific files or directories. Meanwhile, the blame view allows you to pinpoint the last commit that modified a particular line in a file, ensuring accountability in your project updates. Overall, Fork is designed to enhance your development experience by providing essential tools that simplify version control tasks.
Pricing
Integrations
Company Details
Product Details
Fork Features and Options
Fork User Reviews
Write a Review-
Likelihood to Recommend to Others1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Fork: A Solid Git Tool Date: Nov 29 2022
Summary: Overall, Fork is a solid Git tool, that said its usage scenarios are more limited than GitHub and GitLab and is not appropriate for all developers. As someone who has helped other members in my freeware project to setup and configure Git tools, Fork was by far the hardest of the 3 for less technically savvy members to setup. Additionally, the upfront cost and lack of a free option as compared to other tools detracts from the usefulness of this tool in some scenarios.
Positive: Fork is a very solid Git tool with some very nice features. The blame tool in particular is very helpful when trying to debug errors or crashes in software development. That said many of these benefits will not be applicable to all developers or development styles. The performance of the application is solid and the UI is of a decent quality.
Negative: High entry price and no free versions are my main complaints, this tool is not well suited for smaller non-profit, volunteer or freeware groups with its upfront costs when compared to alternatives I have reviewed. Additionally, it is a more technical Git tool, it is not well suited for developers who are adept at more technical code tasks and setups as compared to competitors. Similarly, the UI is not designed as well as those in other Git tools such as GitHub or GitLab.
Read More...
- Previous
- You're on page 1
- Next