CGM LABDAQ User Reviews

Write a Review
  • Name: Lauren H.
    Job Title: Lab Manager
    Length of product use: 2+ Years
    Used How Often?: Daily
    Role: User, Administrator, Deployment
    Organization Size: 1 - 25
    Features
    Design
    Ease
    Pricing
    Support
    Likelihood to Recommend to Others
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    LabDaq

    Date: Feb 16 2022

    Summary: Overall, I like LabDaq. Most projects are not outside the scope and the engineers are always super helpful is training and understanding a project before assisting.

    Positive: Once you understand the flow and how things work, it is easy to create tests, panels, locations, etc for whatever the need is. Reports are easy to pull and data is easily accessible after patients have been processed.

    Negative: Some things are not user friendly, or a simple thing is only in the new version.

    Read More...
    CGM LABDAQ Company Response
    Date: Feb 21 2022
    Thanks for the review, Lauren. We’re glad our support team has been able to help you gain a deeper understanding of the LIS. Our new features continue to add up, so please reach out to your Account Manager to discuss bringing in the latest version of CGM LABDAQ.
  • Name: Andries S.
    Job Title: Director of Laboratory Services
    Length of product use: 2+ Years
    Used How Often?: Daily
    Role: User, Administrator, Deployment
    Organization Size: 1,000 - 4,999
    Features
    Design
    Ease
    Pricing
    Support
    Likelihood to Recommend to Others
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    LabDAQ

    Date: Feb 16 2022

    Summary: LabDAQ has done pretty much everything it has advertised. Although not a perfect system, it works well. If there were a perfect Laboratory Information System, there would only be one Company.

    Positive: LabDAQ is a budget conscious Laboratory Information System that fulfills all the major requirements for a Clinical Laboratory. The Tech Support and Implementation groups have been very helpful in both their efforts to assist and to help teach the intricacies of the system.

    Negative: LabDAQ is a little too locked-down for entities that have strong IT support. Even a Read-Only mode for the configurations would be helpful. LabDAQ-Reference Lab connections could be a bit more robust to more readily simultaneously accommodate multiple reference labs and downstream EMRs.

    Read More...
    CGM LABDAQ Company Response
    Date: Feb 21 2022
    Thanks, Andries. We’re happy that you’ve enjoyed your experiences with our in-house Tech Support and Implementation teams. Thanks for the suggestions, too. We’ll pass those along to product management.
  • Name: Anonymous (Verified)
    Job Title: IT Director
    Length of product use: 2+ Years
    Used How Often?: Daily
    Role: Administrator
    Organization Size: 100 - 499
    Features
    Design
    Ease
    Pricing
    Support
    Likelihood to Recommend to Others
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    CGM LabDaq Review

    Date: Feb 16 2022

    Summary: Overall the experience has been very good with very little downside. I use this product daily and once you learn the ins and outs use is very easy.

    Positive: Tech support is very friendly and helpful. All employees are very knowledgeable and if they don't have an immediate answer they will find it and get back very quickly.

    Negative: Length it takes to do any interfaces is a little long.

    Read More...
    CGM LABDAQ Company Response
    Date: Feb 21 2022
    Thanks for the review. We’re thrilled to be meeting your expectations, and we’re consistently working to try to reduce our turnaround times with implementations and other services.
  • Name: Andrea B.
    Job Title: Laboratory Operations Manager
    Length of product use: 2+ Years
    Used How Often?: Daily
    Role: User, Administrator, Deployment
    Organization Size: 1 - 25
    Features
    Design
    Ease
    Pricing
    Support
    Likelihood to Recommend to Others
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    CGM LabDAQ for the Toxicology Lab

    Date: Feb 10 2022

    Summary: Overall, I'm quite pleased with LabDAQ having used it at two different facilities over the past ten years. I'm still learning new things daily but do feel good about the knowledge I do have

    Positive: LabDAQ gives our lab the flexibility to document and report our toxicology results across a broad range of analytics, methodologies and platforms while giving us the ability to service a wide variety of clients and meet all their reporting needs. The access to analytics data allows us to collate and interpret so many different facets of drug testing - whether it be what drugs are most often seen, what insurance companies are clients have, compliance with medications, turnaround time, etc.

    Negative: I wish there was a better manual for learning the software and walking you through the steps of setting up test, panels, organizations and all the different options. I call tech support and sometimes they help but the process is mostly just trial and error.

    Read More...
    CGM LABDAQ Company Response
    Date: Feb 16 2022
    Thanks, Andrea. We love the way you tap into your system’s incredible database. With that level of reporting and analysis, you can influence everything from patient care to business decisions. Please reach out anytime you need help with something. Our support team is here for you.
  • Name: Anonymous (Verified)
    Job Title: Managing Partner
    Length of product use: 2+ Years
    Used How Often?: Daily
    Role: User, Administrator, Deployment
    Organization Size: 100 - 499
    Features
    Design
    Ease
    Pricing
    Support
    Likelihood to Recommend to Others
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    CGM LABDAQ review.

    Date: Feb 10 2022

    Summary: Good product, user friendly.
    Updates always cause problems.
    Not happy was not set up correctly in the beginning.

    Positive: User friendly.
    Interface deployment is quick.
    Account manager is good.
    24/7 support is active and calls back.

    Negative: Response time.
    Tickets.
    Support.
    Interface support after going live.

    Read More...
    CGM LABDAQ Company Response
    Date: Feb 16 2022
    Thank you for the compliments. We definitely see some room for improvement based on your concerns, and we look forward to helping you more in the future when we get the chance.
  • Name: Susan C.
    Job Title: Director of Ancillary Services
    Length of product use: 2+ Years
    Used How Often?: Daily
    Role: Administrator, Deployment
    Organization Size: 26 - 99
    Features
    Design
    Ease
    Pricing
    Support
    Likelihood to Recommend to Others
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    CGM review

    Date: Feb 10 2022

    Summary: Overall we're pretty happy but it depends a lot on which engineer we work with. Some are better than others but they work pretty well together to figure it out eventually.

    Positive: I love how user friendly it is. New employees pick it up quickly. Tech support is pretty responsive most of the time.

    Negative: I don't like that they Nickle and dime us to death even though we pay a significant amount in monthly fees. Also, frustrated with the turn over of engineers lately. I have 2 interface requests that are a year out and still not finished. The assigned engineers for both these interfaces have been switched at least 3 times so it's been like starting over every time a new project engineer is assigned.

    Read More...
    CGM LABDAQ Company Response
    Date: Feb 16 2022
    Thanks, Susan. We’re happy that you’re pleased overall, but we’re going to check on the status of your interface requests and follow up with you. We’ll be in touch!
  • Name: Anonymous (Verified)
    Job Title: Medical Technologist
    Length of product use: 2+ Years
    Used How Often?: Daily
    Role: User, Administrator
    Organization Size: 1 - 25
    Features
    Design
    Ease
    Pricing
    Support
    Likelihood to Recommend to Others
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    Oncology/Hematology Clinic

    Date: Feb 10 2022

    Summary: We have added a new version since we started and it went pretty well. Not a lot of updates that we could see. Our sales rep has been quick with quotes for our Financial department. The Technical Engineers are knowledgeable but can be a little impatient. The Technical staff overall have been helpful.

    Positive: We have had Labdaq for over 10 years and it has been the first and only LIS we have worked with during this time. We have been pleased overall with the service and the down time has been very low. The technical staff are pleasant for the most part and if they are not able to help, they find the answers. The answers to our questions come within a reasonable time frame 1-2 days although we have had to call or email more than once. Interface with our EMR went pretty smooth. Also, the interface with our reference lab has had few problems.

    Negative: The service when we started 10 years ago was horrible. It has improved tremendously in the past 5 years. When our call is placed the technical staff will and do try to answer our questions right away. If not, a ticket is placed and we hear sooner than later. We do have to call or send emails at times for a follow up.

    Read More...
    CGM LABDAQ Company Response
    Date: Feb 16 2022
    Thanks for the review. We work hard to meet the expectations of our longtime clients, and we’re happy to hear we hit the mark for you. Know that our team will continue to strive to offer the best service and support for years to come.
  • Name: Arceli E.
    Job Title: VP of Operations/Technical Supervisor
    Length of product use: 2+ Years
    Used How Often?: Daily
    Role: User, Administrator, Deployment
    Organization Size: 26 - 99
    Features
    Design
    Ease
    Pricing
    Support
    Likelihood to Recommend to Others
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    CGM LABDAQ

    Date: Feb 10 2022

    Summary: I am happy with LABDAQ, just wished it had all the possible features that a lab needs and not to request for customization all the time.

    Positive: LABDAQ is unique in its features compared to other LIS software i have worked on. It's very user friendly.

    Negative: Every time we need a specific report or even simple changes, it has to go to development and cost is high.

    Read More...
    CGM LABDAQ Company Response
    Date: Feb 16 2022
    Thanks for the feedback, Arceli. We’re always happy to hear that someone enjoys using CGM LABDAQ. Our developers continue to create new functionality and ways to streamline laboratory workflows, so we hope future software updates will continue to impress you. As always, let us know if there’s anything you’d like to see developed, and we’ll do our best to make that happen.