Bitbucket Reviews

Summary: Overall, Bitbucket is an easy-to-use version control tool which can be easily integrated with other third-party application for extra functionality.

Positive: 1. It is one of the best version controlling tool in terms of ease of use.
2. The user interface of the application is user-friendly.
3. Raising PRs is easy and quick.
4. It gets easily integrated with other Atlassian tools like JIRA.
5. Branches can be easily created with just few clicks.

Negative: 1. It only allows repositories up to 2 GB, which be low sometimes for big projects.

Summary: Bitbucket is a source control platform that is fairly reliable and useable, but ultimately does not offer as much as GitHub for the price.

Positive: - pretty reliable uptime and good performance downloading repositories
- clean UI and web interface
- good use account control
- good integration with Atlassian products like JIRA
- has a free tier

Negative: - Pull Request workflow could use some work
- CI/CD features are much worse than GitHub (no Actions replacement)
- expensive compared to GitHub when using enterprise plans

Summary: Overall, Bitbucket is an essential and quite useful application for software development teams collaborating on a project. It is easy to use and feature rich.

Positive: 1. The code can be reviewed easily on Bitbucket, with lots of useful features.
2. It has a great user interface which makes the platform easy to use.
3. It sends dedicated email after every commit and merge for tracking.
4. Not only that, but it can be easily integrated with other Atlassian applications like Jira.

Negative: 1. It does not have a built-in CI/CD pipeline feature.
2. The pricing is on a bit higher side.

Summary: Overall, Bitbucket can be a considerable version control tool for users looking for an easy-to-use tool for branch management and code reviews.

Positive: - It enables a smooth workflow environment for the developer working in the team by providing features code review before pushing it.
- Managing the code and different branches is an easy task with Bit Bucket.
- It can be easily connected to other application like VS Code and Jira for feature enhancement and increase productivity increment.

Negative: - The interface should be more customizable.
- The community is not large.

Summary: Overall, Bit bucket is a great tool to manage the source code and review it. It also supports CI/CD pipelines.

Positive: - Bit bucket is extremely easy to configure and integrate with other apps.
- It is easy to use and cost-effective.
- The repositories are safe and secure.

Negative: - The SSH key management on Bit bucket is confusing.

Summary: Overall, Bitbucket is a user-friendly software that helps in managing and sharing of code and makes the whole process hassle-free.

Positive: - Bitbucket lets the user manage code and data easily.
- Code can be shared with other team members securely.
- It works like an extension of git that improves, and increase git functionalities.

Negative: - The only con is that the third-party integration is not supported.

Summary: Bitbucket is a good alternative for working with small teams, and orients its plans based on this. For example, Bitbucket's base plan only occupies 5 users, and it is enough to be able to create large enough data repositories. Bitbucket is good at integrating with other Atlassian services depending on whether you want to work with issues.

Positive: Using Bitbucket we can greatly increase the visibility we have of our data from all the work, so everyone involved in the project can review it starting with the backlogs of each project developed. We like that the compilation capability we get from the integration between Bitbucket and Slack is something so easy to exploit.

Negative: Bitbucket's table system makes organizing the data provided from sales funnels something almost didactic, whose exaggerated simplicity does not lead to any difficulty. The code review system does not offer fast enough real-time views of the project, so time is wasted while the project loads inside the computer.

Summary: Bitbucket is a great option for organizations using the Atlassian suite of softwares or for small teams looking for a VCS with free private repositories feature.

Positive: Seamless integration with Jira and Confluence for issue management and documentation.
Source Code indexing and search feature.
Slack Integration.
Free private repositories.

Negative: Smaller user community.
Lack of third party support.
Not as intuitive as GitHub.

Summary: I'm using Bitbucket for many years since it was the only service with free private repositories. My demands for a GIT-repos are not so high since I do data analysis, but I understand that some advanced features are missing.

Positive: - all the tools I need for a source code storage for my data analysis projects
- ideal for small teams: free tier was enough to work with a couple of collaborators, private repos are included
- CI/CD tools are useful to automate some work, i.e. publish html pages on an external website after committing changes
- Bitbucket has a very convenient GIT GUI program for managing repositories

Negative: - Bitbucket is not the most popular GIT-repository, so I can imagine that it may not be a best fit for someone who wants to grow a software start-up.

Summary: Bitbucket is a decent alternative to Github with a familiar featureset and the added advantage of private repositories.

Positive: Similar interface and features to GitHub means less new things to learn.
Provides free private repositories in addition to public repos
Integrates with few third party apps like Slack.
Integrates with other Atlassian tools like Confluence.

Negative: Restrictions on collaborating with more than 5 users.
Lacks advanced features.