Best Decentralized Identity Solutions of 2025

Find and compare the best Decentralized Identity solutions in 2025

Use the comparison tool below to compare the top Decentralized Identity solutions on the market. You can filter results by user reviews, pricing, features, platform, region, support options, integrations, and more.

  • 1
    IAP Network Reviews

    IAP Network

    Information Assurance Platform

    The IAP, with its innovative combination of blockchain, zero-knowledge and meta-consensus protocol, allows any of these parties, to cryptographically verify the existence of evidence or states, or to prove activities to anyone interested. They also allow for total transparency without sacrificing sensitive data privacy. Allow anyone to create a proof of existence, such as an historical event or a legal document, with a time stamp. Third parties, like auditors or consumers can independently verify the proof without compromising the privacy or confidentiality.
  • 2
    DL3ARN Reviews
    Discover data ownership, privacy and personalized insights in a user-friendly solution. Decentralizing data storage improves data security by protecting information from centralized vulnerabilities. Verification, robust security features and a traceable system of data will protect your information from unauthorized access. Interoperability of our platform connects data across multiple sectors to provide a comprehensive view, empowering informed decision-making. Share your data with researchers, organizations and marketers, while maintaining ownership. Take control of data ownership by deciding who can access it and how to use it, while ensuring privacy.
  • 3
    Dock Certs Reviews
    Convert verified ID data to reusable digital credentials. Reduce verification friction without compromising on security. Enable secure data exchanges using fraud-proof data.
  • 4
    EDUFIED Reviews
    System for issuing authorities that allows them to issue verifiable document to recipients. They can store and share these documents securely through their digital wallet.
  • 5
    Identity.com Reviews
    We use open-source, industry-standard identifiers known as Decentralized Identifiers to enable off-chain verification. DIDs can be seen as a new form of global identifier and are an integral part of building a native layer of identity. We built and maintain did:sol, a leading DID method for the Solana Blockchain. The Gateway Protocol is designed to protect against cybercrime as well as satisfy regulators. It allows any business or application (such KYC and AML requirements) to meet identity requirements without developing its own identity verification system. Identity verification is instead completed by gatekeepers within gatekeeper networks.
  • 6
    Peer Mountain Reviews
    Peer Mountain does more than just give users ownership and control of their cryptographically secured identities. It is a complete application ecosystem that facilitates secure exchange of digital and tangible services. Gain assurance that independent audits are reliable and secure and that claims are verified. Share and validate encrypted data only in accordance with transaction requirements. Segment services across Peer Mountain deployments in a transparent and secure manner. Control your data with a distributed system which makes hacking impossible. Peer Mountain is a service provider for consumers who are interested in self-sovereign identities, service providers that need reliable, continuous compliance, and trust providers that offer validation services and need interoperability.
  • 7
    Hushmesh Reviews
    Identity theft is a result of the domain-centric, disjointed architecture of the Web. The Web is unable to manage identity without a global namespace. This "each domain for themselves" model makes global security of identity impossible. The Mesh's cryptographic namespace, on the other hand, allows for the creation of unique keychains per person or non-person entity. Domains can lock their users accounts using unique keys stored on their keychains. Data breaches are symptoms that the domain-centric model of data security on the Web is flawed. The Web does not have built-in cryptographic protection at the entity or person level. Each domain must secure its own data. This approach increases the global surface of attack and places "domain insiders" in the middle, creating vulnerabilities and liabilities.