Compare NeoLoad vs. UI-licious

Software for continuous performance testing to automate API load and application testing. For complex applications, you can design code-free performance tests. Script performance tests in automated pipelines for API test. You can design, maintain, and run performance tests in code. Then analyze the results within continuous integration pipelines with pre-packaged plugins for CI/CD tools or the NeoLoad API. You can quickly create test scripts for large, complex applications with a graphical user interface. This allows you to skip the tedious task of manually coding new or updated tests. SLAs can be defined based on the built-in monitoring metrics. To determine the app's performance, put pressure on it and compare SLAs with server-level statistics. Automate pass/fail triggers using SLAs. Contributes to root cause analysis. Automatic test script updates make it easier to update test scripts. For easy maintenance, update only the affected part of the test and re-use any remaining.

Stop writing brittle test with hard-coded CSS, waits, and XPATH selectors. Make your tests meaningful, easy to maintain, and reusable. This is because writing tests with hard-coded CSS or XPATH selectors is similar to pouring concrete on a specific UI implementation. This creates high-maintenance tests which break at the most minor changes to the UI and is difficult for humans to understand. UI-licious uses dynamic codes analysis to analyze the structure of your website. This is done using ARIA accessibility attributes and semantic HTML. It also examines the context of previous commands to determine which element should be targeted for each command. This means that even if HTML code for the UI is changed underneath the code, the test will still be valid as long the user's journey remains the same. Your website does not have to be perfect for UI-licious work.