Compare Hyperproof vs. ProActive QMS

Compliance work eats engineering time. Hyperproof exists to give that time back by automating the parts of GRC that don't need a human: pulling evidence out of GitHub, Jira, ServiceNow, Snyk, and cloud storage on a schedule, running recurring tests against high-frequency controls, and kicking off a task automatically the moment something fails instead of waiting for the next audit cycle to find out. Under the hood, Hyperproof maps one control to 160+ frameworks (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, NIST, and others), so a control tested once can satisfy several standards instead of forcing teams to rebuild the same work per framework. AI agents handle the first pass on evidence review and gap-flagging, leaving humans to make the actual judgment calls rather than hunting down documentation. Teams using it report cutting audit prep by roughly 350 hours a year, a 66% drop in duplicate controls, and about $150K saved annually on control orchestration. It also scales to messier org charts, with the ability to scope controls by business unit or entity instead of flattening everything into one program. Built in 2018 out of the Seattle area, Hyperproof is used by engineering and security-heavy orgs like Reddit, Fortinet, Appian, and Outreach that are tired of treating compliance as a manual, spreadsheet-and-email process and want it to run more like the rest of their infrastructure: automated, monitored, and auditable.

Software designed for ISO and BRC compliance fulfills the criteria of various management standards, such as ISO 9001, 14001, ISO 45001, ISO 27001, and the BRC benchmarks. It features a robust and user-friendly CAPA system that effectively documents continuous improvement initiatives, non-conformities, root cause analyses, corrective and preventive actions, and key performance data on losses. The software also ensures efficient version and change control for system documentation and regulated forms. Additionally, it implements location-based controls to restrict user access to documents based on their specific roles. There is a compliance evaluation tool that details the necessary compliance obligations, assigns departmental responsibilities, and provides guidance on adhering to legal and other relevant standards, applicable to both single and multiple standards, including ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, ISO 27001, and others. Furthermore, it simplifies the qualification, ongoing evaluation, and performance improvement of suppliers, service providers, and contractors through tailored risk management workflows, assessments, scheduled re-assessments, and focused action logs. This comprehensive approach ensures that organizations not only meet compliance standards but also foster a culture of continuous improvement and accountability.