Average Ratings 0 Ratings

Total
ease
features
design
support

No User Reviews. Be the first to provide a review:

Write a Review

Average Ratings 0 Ratings

Total
ease
features
design
support

No User Reviews. Be the first to provide a review:

Write a Review

Description

Identity theft arises from the fragmented, domain-focused structure of the internet. Lacking a comprehensive global namespace, each domain must handle identity on its own, resulting in a "survival of the fittest" approach that renders effective global identity security unattainable. Conversely, the Mesh introduces a cryptographic namespace that allows for the establishment of personal keychains for both individuals and non-person entities. This system empowers domains to secure their users' accounts with distinct keys linked to their respective keychains, enhancing security measures. Data breaches often reflect the shortcomings of the domain-centric data protection model prevalent on the internet. In the absence of integrated cryptographic safeguards at the individual or entity level, each domain must independently secure its data, leading to an expanded global attack surface. This situation creates opportunities for "domain insiders" to exploit vulnerabilities, thus increasing liability and risk in the process. Ultimately, a more unified security approach could significantly diminish these risks and enhance overall trust in online interactions.

Description

A typical flat vL3 domain enables databases operating across various clusters, clouds, or hybrid environments to seamlessly interact for the purpose of database replication. Workloads from different organizations can connect to a unified 'collaborative' Service Mesh, facilitating interactions across companies. Each workload is restricted to a single connectivity domain, with the stipulation that only those workloads residing in the same runtime domain can participate in that connectivity. In essence, Connectivity Domains are intricately linked to Runtime Domains. However, a fundamental principle of Cloud Native architectures is to promote Loose Coupling. This characteristic allows each workload the flexibility to receive services from different providers as needed. The specific Runtime Domain in which a workload operates is irrelevant to its communication requirements. Regardless of their locations, workloads that belong to the same application need to establish connectivity among themselves, emphasizing the importance of inter-workload communication. Ultimately, this approach ensures that application performance and collaboration remain unaffected by the underlying infrastructure.

API Access

Has API No 

API Access

Has API Yes 

Screenshots View All

Screenshots View All

Integrations

Amazon Web Services (AWS) No 
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) No 
Kubernetes No 
Meshery No 
Microsoft Azure No 

Integrations

Amazon Web Services (AWS) Yes 
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) Yes 
Kubernetes Yes 
Meshery Yes 
Microsoft Azure Yes 

Pricing Details

No price information available.
Free Trial No 
Free Version No 

Pricing Details

Free
Free Trial No 
Free Version Yes 

Deployment

Web-Based Yes 
On-Premises No 
iPhone App No 
iPad App No 
Android App No 
Windows No 
Mac No 
Linux No 
Chromebook No 

Deployment

Web-Based Yes 
On-Premises Yes 
iPhone App No 
iPad App No 
Android App No 
Windows No 
Mac No 
Linux No 
Chromebook No 

Customer Support

Business Hours No 
Live Rep (24/7) No 
Online Support Yes 

Customer Support

Business Hours No 
Live Rep (24/7) No 
Online Support Yes 

Types of Training

Training Docs No 
Webinars No 
Live Training (Online) No 
In Person No 

Types of Training

Training Docs Yes 
Webinars Yes 
Live Training (Online) No 
In Person No 

Vendor Details

Company Name

Hushmesh

Website

www.hushmesh.com

Vendor Details

Company Name

Network Service Mesh

Website

networkservicemesh.io

Product Features

Product Features

Alternatives

Hyperledger Indy Reviews

Hyperledger Indy

Hyperledger

Alternatives