Average Ratings 0 Ratings
Average Ratings 0 Ratings
Description
Identity theft arises from the fragmented, domain-focused structure of the internet. Lacking a comprehensive global namespace, each domain must handle identity on its own, resulting in a "survival of the fittest" approach that renders effective global identity security unattainable. Conversely, the Mesh introduces a cryptographic namespace that allows for the establishment of personal keychains for both individuals and non-person entities. This system empowers domains to secure their users' accounts with distinct keys linked to their respective keychains, enhancing security measures. Data breaches often reflect the shortcomings of the domain-centric data protection model prevalent on the internet. In the absence of integrated cryptographic safeguards at the individual or entity level, each domain must independently secure its data, leading to an expanded global attack surface. This situation creates opportunities for "domain insiders" to exploit vulnerabilities, thus increasing liability and risk in the process. Ultimately, a more unified security approach could significantly diminish these risks and enhance overall trust in online interactions.
Description
A typical flat vL3 domain enables databases operating across various clusters, clouds, or hybrid environments to seamlessly interact for the purpose of database replication. Workloads from different organizations can connect to a unified 'collaborative' Service Mesh, facilitating interactions across companies. Each workload is restricted to a single connectivity domain, with the stipulation that only those workloads residing in the same runtime domain can participate in that connectivity. In essence, Connectivity Domains are intricately linked to Runtime Domains. However, a fundamental principle of Cloud Native architectures is to promote Loose Coupling. This characteristic allows each workload the flexibility to receive services from different providers as needed. The specific Runtime Domain in which a workload operates is irrelevant to its communication requirements. Regardless of their locations, workloads that belong to the same application need to establish connectivity among themselves, emphasizing the importance of inter-workload communication. Ultimately, this approach ensures that application performance and collaboration remain unaffected by the underlying infrastructure.
API Access
Has API
No
API Access
Has API
Yes
Integrations
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
No
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
No
Kubernetes
No
Meshery
No
Microsoft Azure
No
Integrations
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Yes
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
Yes
Kubernetes
Yes
Meshery
Yes
Microsoft Azure
Yes
Pricing Details
No price information available.
Free Trial
No
Free Version
No
Pricing Details
Free
Free Trial
No
Free Version
Yes
Deployment
Web-Based
Yes
On-Premises
No
iPhone App
No
iPad App
No
Android App
No
Windows
No
Mac
No
Linux
No
Chromebook
No
Deployment
Web-Based
Yes
On-Premises
Yes
iPhone App
No
iPad App
No
Android App
No
Windows
No
Mac
No
Linux
No
Chromebook
No
Customer Support
Business Hours
No
Live Rep (24/7)
No
Online Support
Yes
Customer Support
Business Hours
No
Live Rep (24/7)
No
Online Support
Yes
Types of Training
Training Docs
No
Webinars
No
Live Training (Online)
No
In Person
No
Types of Training
Training Docs
Yes
Webinars
Yes
Live Training (Online)
No
In Person
No
Vendor Details
Company Name
Hushmesh
Website
www.hushmesh.com
Vendor Details
Company Name
Network Service Mesh
Website
networkservicemesh.io