Compare BigLake vs. Hydrolix

BigLake serves as a storage engine that merges the functionalities of data warehouses and lakes, allowing BigQuery and open-source frameworks like Spark to efficiently access data while enforcing detailed access controls. It enhances query performance across various multi-cloud storage systems and supports open formats, including Apache Iceberg. Users can maintain a single version of data, ensuring consistent features across both data warehouses and lakes. With its capacity for fine-grained access management and comprehensive governance over distributed data, BigLake seamlessly integrates with open-source analytics tools and embraces open data formats. This solution empowers users to conduct analytics on distributed data, regardless of its storage location or method, while selecting the most suitable analytics tools, whether they be open-source or cloud-native, all based on a singular data copy. Additionally, it offers fine-grained access control for open-source engines such as Apache Spark, Presto, and Trino, along with formats like Parquet. As a result, users can execute high-performing queries on data lakes driven by BigQuery. Furthermore, BigLake collaborates with Dataplex, facilitating scalable management and logical organization of data assets. This integration not only enhances operational efficiency but also simplifies the complexities of data governance in large-scale environments.

Hydrolix serves as a streaming data lake that integrates decoupled storage, indexed search, and stream processing, enabling real-time query performance at a terabyte scale while significantly lowering costs. CFOs appreciate the remarkable 4x decrease in data retention expenses, while product teams are thrilled to have four times more data at their disposal. You can easily activate resources when needed and scale down to zero when they are not in use. Additionally, you can optimize resource usage and performance tailored to each workload, allowing for better cost management. Imagine the possibilities for your projects when budget constraints no longer force you to limit your data access. You can ingest, enhance, and transform log data from diverse sources such as Kafka, Kinesis, and HTTP, ensuring you retrieve only the necessary information regardless of the data volume. This approach not only minimizes latency and costs but also eliminates timeouts and ineffective queries. With storage being independent from ingestion and querying processes, each aspect can scale independently to achieve both performance and budget goals. Furthermore, Hydrolix's high-density compression (HDX) often condenses 1TB of data down to an impressive 55GB, maximizing storage efficiency. By leveraging such innovative capabilities, organizations can fully harness their data potential without financial constraints.