Compare Adaptive Security vs. GPT-5.5-Cyber

Adaptive Security is OpenAI’s investment for AI cyber threats. The company was founded in 2024 by serial entrepreneurs Brian Long and Andrew Jones. Adaptive has raised $50M+ from investors like OpenAI, a16z and executives at Google Cloud, Fidelity, Plaid, Shopify, and other leading companies. Adaptive protects customers from AI-powered cyber threats like deepfakes, vishing, smishing, and email spear phishing with its next-generation security awareness training and AI phishing simulation platform. With Adaptive, security teams can prepare employees for advanced threats with incredible, highly customized training content that is personalized for employee role and access levels, features open-source intelligence about their company, and includes amazing deepfakes of their own executives. Customers can measure the success of their training program over time with AI-powered phishing simulations. Hyper-realistic deepfake, voice, SMS, and email phishing tests assess risk levels across all threat vectors. Adaptive simulations are powered by an AI open-source intelligence engine that gives clients visibility into how their company's digital footprint can be leveraged by cybercriminals. Today, Adaptive’s customers include leading global organizations like Figma, The Dallas Mavericks, BMC Software, and Stone Point Capital. The company has a world class NPS score of 94, among the highest in cybersecurity.

OpenAI's GPT-5.5 with Trusted Access for Cyber represents an identity and trust-based approach designed to ensure that advanced cyber capabilities are utilized appropriately. This model enhances the utility of GPT-5.5 for verified defenders engaged in sanctioned defensive operations, while still imposing limitations to prevent actions that could lead to real-world harm. For the majority of teams, this iteration of GPT-5.5 stands out as OpenAI's most robust model for genuine defensive applications, featuring improved safeguards for essential tasks like secure code review, vulnerability assessment and triage, malware analysis, binary reverse engineering, detection engineering, and patch validation. Approved defenders benefit from a reduced rate of classifier-based refusals when conducting authorized cybersecurity tasks, yet the system maintains its protective measures against harmful activities, including credential theft, stealth, persistence, malware deployment, and exploitation of external systems. Consequently, this model not only enhances operational efficiency for cybersecurity professionals but also prioritizes the security and integrity of the overall cyber environment.