Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:What do you know. (Score 1) 246

The test was good. It was Safari that had the flaw. ...

I disagree, at least in part. The setting which was modified for testing purposes was intended to disable local caching of webpages, correct? Theoretically this was done in order to simulate a more accurate representation of real world performance, by pulling static test pages across the network instead of from the local cache. I don't know about you, but my own browsing habits do not have me frequently reloading static pages; rather, I'm loading various dynamic pages throughout the day, such as Google search results, Slashdot, Ars Technica, a webmail interface... etc. Certain of these pages will sometimes -- but not every time -- require a network fetch. That is to say, now and then the browser determines that a page has not been updated since the last fetch, and so that page can reasonably be pulled from the cache instead of over the network. Very obviously, that's the whole point of the cache. Therefore, an accurate testing scenario would by necessity have to include some mixture of dynamic pages alongside the static pages within the test suite, so that toggling hidden settings not commonly used by the general public would not be required in order to facilitate a "more accurate" simulated testing environment.

That said: It's a peculiar side effect that they happened upon a bug in that hidden setting, and the existence of that bug was indeed Apple's fault. However, the fact that Consumer Reports based their recommendation on tests which have proven to be poor representations of the systems performance, and as of yet they have failed to update their review to account for that... that firmly leaves us in a mixed responsibility scenario, with Consumer Reports sharing some of the fault as well. Apple has performed their due diligence by fixing their bug and patching it for the next beta build; Consumer Reports now needs to likewise complete their due diligence, by updating the article accordingly upon receipt of that fixed build. (Or, you know... I suppose they could fix their tests in a more permanent fashion, by simply adding a few artificially generated dynamic pages to their test server, and not using hidden and/or non-default features during testing in the first place. Creating those dynamic pages wouldn't even remotely be difficult; a basic random number generator and just about any server-side scripting environment would handily do the trick.)

... As for actual user, you do know that Macs are popular among web designers?

The original poster should have said "typical user" rather than "actual user" -- but nonetheless, I would still have to call this a red herring; it's largely immaterial to the testing scenario under discussion. But if it is pertinent at all, then I would suggest that it's probably still quite common for manufacturers to (rightly) cry foul when a supposedly impartial reviewer changes the default settings of a unit under testing, generating adverse test results... just as it's common for reviewers and users alike to cry foul, when manufacturers attempt to pull the same stunt to inflate test results.

Comment Big family = no-brainer (Score 1) 341

My home theater consists of a mid-range 1080p projector giving me 110 inches and a mid-range 5.1 Bose, driven by a Mac Mini. By far and away not the most impressive home theater in the world... but certainly good enough for most viewing -- particularly when you consider that I also have seven kids, one of whom is autistic and prone to noisy behavior and to leaving his seat frequently, and on top of that, my best friend also has four kids. So even not taking into account extended family, I would absolutely go for early release to home in a heartbeat. The number of viewers in my core group alone would make such a system pay for itself after only a few kids' movies, and occasional adult movies with friends would be a not-terribly-difficult splurge, particularly considering how expensive theaters have gotten. So even with a moderate upfront cost, as some of the options have suggested, this would still be a complete no-brainer for me.

That said... I would still go to the theater with my wife, on occasional date nights. You have to get away from the kids entirely for a little while every now and then, or you'll go stir crazy!

Submission + - With Bioelectronic Medicine, You Can Zap a Nerve to Stop Bleeding (

the_newsbeagle writes: A seriously wounded person can bleed out within minutes. So first responders, battlefield medics, and surgeons will all be interested in this new technology: a "neural tourniquet" that stops blood loss by zapping a nerve. The handheld device stimulates the vagus nerve to send an electrical signal through the nerve to the spleen, where the blood cells responsible for forming clots receive instructions. This signal primes the cells so that they form clots faster if they encounter a wound anywhere in the body; a study in pigs showed 40% less bleeding time and 50% less blood loss. A startup called Sanguistat is testing the device first as a treatment for postpartum hemorrhage.

Comment We don't need no stinkin' browser share... (Score 1) 322

Gee, I had no idea that Microsoft was so adamant about minimizing the market share of Edge. Because this is a sure fire way to guarantee that Windows users have no interest in ever launching their new fledgling browser. Kudos to you, Microsoft, for advocating for third party browsers! Hey, I'll be more then happy to help out, by tossing those pesky Edge shortcuts on every Windows 10 box I come across...

Comment Ambiguity, much? (Score 1) 112

... "About 82% of households that use a TV currently subscribe to a pay-TV service," Bruce Leichtman of Leichtman Research said...

That statement could use some clarification; I consider myself to be a cord-cutter, with an internet-only broadband connection, (no landline and no "cable" TV subscription, premium channels or otherwise) but it would be easy to argue that I should be included in this statistic, because I subscribe to both Hulu and Netflix. Which is it? Am I really a cord-cutter, or am I simply subscribing to the next generation of "premium" services?

Comment Alternatively, you could just... (Score 1) 347

Anyone who's been a MacHead for more than a few years knows that you always try to avoid buying overpriced commodity add-ons from Apple; you buy them from Amazon, Newegg or the like. In this situation, for example, you might choose to just use your existing charging cable with a USB-C to USB3 adapter for $10, saving fifteen bucks over the Apple adapter cable.

Submission + - Google interview process big turn off for experienced engineers (

mysterious_mark writes: There's an article in the Business Insider discussing how the interview process at Google is really just geared for recent CS grads, and makes no sense for experienced engineers. Apparently the only criteria to work at Google is one's ability to do white board code problems, actual engineering experience counts for nothing. This may explain why the average engineer at Google is under 30, the problem is partly due to age discrimination, and also because older and more experienced engineers simply don't want to deal with the interview process.

Comment Apple is no more intransigent than YOU. (Score 1) 289

"Apple is seeking for itself the exclusive use of Australia's existing NFC terminal infrastructure for the making of integrated mobile payments using iOS devices. Yet, this infrastructure was built and paid for by Australian banks and merchants for the benefit of all Australians."

Let's just parse this a bit more closely, and see what it boils down to: "Apple is seeking ... exclusive use of ... integrated mobile payments using iOS devices."

Whoops. What was that? Apple wants to profit from the hardware and software that they themselves developed? Huh.

Now, the banks' real point: "... this infrastructure [that is, the existing NFC terminals] was built and paid for by Australian banks and merchants for the benefit of all Australians." Oh. So the truth of the matter is, you want to retain control over your ecosystem, and Apple wants to retain control over their ecosystem. Isn't that something?

Funny thing is, the banks (worldwide) do indeed have full control over their respective ecosystems; all they have to do is ignore Apple, and implement something on Android. Unless, of course, that's too much work for them, or possibly not as profitable as Apple's iOS ecosystem, for some reason...

Bottom line: the banks are just trying to find a way to maximize their share of the profits, pure and simple. Nothing much to see, here... just your standard money grab.

Comment Digital tethering is more effective anyway (Score 4, Insightful) 76

This shouldn't be surprising, actually. The market for stolen iPhones has taken a serious hit, because of Apple's iTunes account locking policies. You steal my iPhone, I immediately lock you out of it. If I'm feeling particularly adventurous, I might even go to the trouble of tracking you down, maybe even with a police officer in tow. "Your" stolen device is not only now a brick... it's also a liability. Would-be thieves know this; they'll get at most a few hours of use out of any iPhone that they steal, and likely only a few minutes, if they set off alarms as they're stealing it from a store -- and worst case scenario, (for the thief, that is) they're also much more likely to get jail time for their crime.

Now, contrast that with a physical tether, which can be snipped quickly and easily with the right tool. No contest.

On the other hand, now actual potential buyers will get the sense that Apple actually wants them in the stores, wants them to feel comfortable... and of course, wants them to spend money. So for Apple, this probably all makes perfect sense.

Submission + - DRM? DRM!? We don't need no stinkin' DRM! (

zarmanto writes: Ars Technica reports that one particular game studio might finally get it, when it comes to DRMed game content. They're publishing their latest game, Shadow Warrior 2 with no DRM protection at all. From the article:

"We don't support piracy, but currently there isn't a good way to stop it without hurting our customers," Flying Wild Hog developer Krzysztof “KriS” Narkowicz wrote...

... "We hope that our fans, who were always very supportive, will support us this time as well," Zielinski told Kotaku. "...In our imperfect world, the best anti-pirate protection is when the games are good, highly polished, easily accessible and inexpensive," Maksara added.

Submission + - Android Trojan Asks Victims to Submit a Selfie Holding Their ID Card (

An anonymous reader writes: Untrained and gullible Android users are now the target of an Android banking trojan that asks them to send a selfie holding their ID card. The trojan, considered the most sophisticated Android trojan known today, is named Acecard, and this most recent version has been detected only in Hong Kong and Singapore for now.

The purpose of requiring a selfie of the victim holding its ID card is for the crook to prove himself when making fraudulent bank transactions, calling tech support posing as the victim, or for taking over social media accounts for Facebook or Twitter, who often required ID scans in the case of account takeover disputes.

Comment Cable Companies LIE to keep you... (Score 5, Informative) 250

Cord cutter, here. If you're thinking of joining me by switching down to an internet-only service, you need to know this: Your cable company is going to lie to you. They're going to tell you all kinds of stories about how they don't actually offer internet-only options, or about how it's actually less expensive to have a bundle than it is to go internet-only. Don't believe them. There is exactly one way to get the full truth out of them: Tell them you're cancelling. As soon as they transfer you to the retention department, someone who actually knows what they're talking about will happily give you that internet-only connection you're looking for, and most likely at a reasonable price, too... at least, for the first year, anyway.

Sidenote: Obviously, this only works if you have at least one other viable broadband provider in your area. If you live in one of the many broadband monopoly areas... well, in that case, you have my sympathies, because you are well and truly screwed.

Comment Rock and a hard place (Score 1) 222

There's really no mystery to this: Verizon is sticking to that unconvincing party line, because they're between the proverbial rock and a hard place. The restrictions they agreed to when they purchased their Block C spectrum license state that they're not permitted to restrict the ways in which you use your data connection on their wireless network; if you want to tether your BitTorrent PC to your Verizon Wireless cell phone and let it saturate that connection 24/7, they can't stop you -- they quite literally can't even slow you down. Thus, in order to make that kind of abuse of their network exorbitantly expensive, the only option that seems to be left to them is metering. We could probably argue ceaselessly about whether or not their current metered plans and overage fees are actually reasonable based on typical user activity -- but that's another discussion entirely. The point is, Verizon is never going to back down from those meters. Because they can't.

Mind you, I'm not making apologies for them... they made their bed, (by buying that spectrum in the first place) and now they have to sleep in it. But I don't have to sleep in it with them.

Slashdot Top Deals

Usage: fortune -P [-f] -a [xsz] Q: file [rKe9] -v6[+] file1 ...